We're also happy to vote against it because it's redundant, I think, in the sense that the new amendments from the government basically say the conviction has to occur after the amendments come into force, but the conduct can occur at any time, including before the act comes into force.
This says the sections apply to “any person that is a member of the Senate or House of Commons, to conduct that occurred before June 3, 2013” which is already caught by the language.
We'll agree to vote against it because it's redundant.