Evidence of meeting #126 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was agreed.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Stephanie Kusie  Calgary Midnapore, CPC
Jean-François Morin  Senior Policy Advisor, Privy Council Office
Trevor Knight  Senior Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Robert Sampson  Legal Counsel, Legal Services, Elections Canada
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk

6:55 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Is he allowed to speak again?

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We'll vote on the amendment.

6:55 p.m.

Conservative

John Nater Conservative Perth—Wellington, ON

I'd like a recorded vote.

(Amendment negatived: nays 5; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])

(Clause 297 agreed to on division)

(Clauses 298 and 299 agreed to)

(On clause 300)

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Clause 300 has a residual amendment, which is CPC-136.

Mr. Nater would like to present this.

6:55 p.m.

Conservative

John Nater Conservative Perth—Wellington, ON

Chair, this would offset the clawback. If there's overspending, obviously there's a clawback, so it would offset that rebate.

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Mr. Bittle.

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON

I'll just ask the officials this. From our viewpoint it seems to be redundant.

6:55 p.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

Subsection 477.74(3) already affects the amount calculated at subsection (2), and currently paragraph 477.75(1)(d) does not refer to subsection (3), so it would appear unnecessary, unless I'm not seeing something.

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Are you saying this wouldn't make any difference?

6:55 p.m.

LCdr Jean-François Morin

No.

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])

6:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

We now have CPC-137.

I'll ask Mr. Reid to present this.

6:55 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston, ON

As tempted as I am by that generous offer I'm going to defer to my colleague Mr. Nater.

7 p.m.

Conservative

John Nater Conservative Perth—Wellington, ON

Just to go back and clarify this, typically expenses are rebated now at 60%. Changes in this act have some expenses being rebated at different amounts. In some cases it's 90%.

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Like day care?

7 p.m.

Conservative

John Nater Conservative Perth—Wellington, ON

Exactly. This would clarify the overall cap in terms of the amount that would be rebated at 75%, all things included.

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Mr. Cullen.

7 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Why do you want to do that?

7 p.m.

Conservative

John Nater Conservative Perth—Wellington, ON

Mr. Richards had the foresight to table this motion.

7 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Where is he? I've been wondering who this Mr. Richards is.

7 p.m.

Liberal

Sherry Romanado Liberal Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne, QC

He's with Scott.

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

He tabled all these amendments.

7 p.m.

NDP

Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

He's very interested in this committee and he doesn't show up.

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Mr. Bittle.

7 p.m.

Liberal

Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON

Our concern is that the amendment would in effect reduce the important allowance that C-76 creates for reimbursing costs that help candidates connect with voters who have disabilities, in my own words.

7 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Larry Bagnell

Do you have a response to that, Mr. Nater?