There's a superseding motion to adjourn.
(Motion negatived)
Evidence of meeting #74 for Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chairman.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Conservative
Bloc
Yves Lessard Bloc Chambly—Borduas, QC
Mr. Chairman, an attempt like the one that was just made could prevent us from voting. Our colleagues say that they are in favour of the motions. This is not a complicated issue. Basically, there are two elements. The minister said that he would not provide us with the list, and that we should go to the website, Mr. Chairman. The minister disposes of means that we do not have. He could give us a list by riding. It is not complicated, if we give a date for handing it in. There is no need to draft the amendment. I think that we are ready for the vote. Afterwards, we could table the report before the House. Therefore, Mr. Chairman, I move that we vote now.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
I have to suspend the meeting right now, which means this has to be the first order of business when we come back Thursday morning.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
Well, there are still people who want to talk about that.
I believe there was broad support for the original motion before the amendments.
I still have two people--
Conservative
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
I have the 48th report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs....
Go ahead, Mr. Savage.
Liberal
Michael Savage Liberal Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS
If the government is indicating that they would support the original motion, then I will withdraw my amendment if we vote tonight. With their permission, I'll bring that forward as a separate motion on Thursday morning at nine o'clock.
Conservative
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
Okay. Are we finished talking, then? Can we go back to Mr. Lessard's motion?
We'll do number 20.
(Motion agreed to)
Conservative
Conservative
Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB
I have one quick point. All I want to do is make it consistent with number 20. You refer to private companies, but in number 21 you do not refer to non-profit organizations. I want to get the same information for both years.
Liberal
Conservative
Mike Lake Conservative Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB
It's a friendly amendment to say a “list of private companies and non-profit organizations”.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
Is the friendly amendment okay--for privates as well as for non-profits? All right, then.
We'll vote on the amendment.
(Amendment agreed to)
(Motion as amended agreed to) [See Minutes of Proceedings]
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
We have a confidence vote.
Thank you very much.
The meeting is adjourned.