Evidence of meeting #37 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was consultants.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Les Linklater  Director General, Immigration Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
François Guilbault  Senior General Counsel, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada
Steve Sloan  Director, Criminal Investigations Division, Enforcement Branch, Canada Border Services Agency
Superintendent Mike Cabana  Chief Superintendent, Director General, Border Integrity, Federal and International Operations, Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Denis Meunier  Director General, Enforcement and Disclosures Directorate, Compliance Programs Branch, Canada Revenue Agency
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Andrew Chaplin

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Yes.

4:30 p.m.

Director General, Immigration Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Les Linklater

I believe it's being absorbed into the department's communications budget.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

How much money do you guess you'll be spending?

4:30 p.m.

Director General, Immigration Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Les Linklater

I don't want to venture a guess, but I can certainly go back and look for a figure.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Would you be able to provide that to us in this committee within the next 10 business days?

4:30 p.m.

Director General, Immigration Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Les Linklater

We'll certainly look into it and do our best.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Since you're going to do that, could you also provide for us how much money the minister spent on advertising Bill C-50 in the last month?

4:30 p.m.

Director General, Immigration Branch, Department of Citizenship and Immigration

Les Linklater

I think that question is probably best addressed to the minister when she appears.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Yes.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

I have a point of order.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

I think it's been dealt with.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Mr. Chair, with all due respect, since Mr. Linklater--

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

There's a point of order here.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Point of order.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Ed Komarnicki Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

We are not studying any aspect of Bill C-50 here today. We'll have an opportunity to do so, and the question can be put at the appropriate time.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

That's a valid point of order. We will be dealing with it at another point.

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Jim Karygiannis Liberal Scarborough—Agincourt, ON

Since Mr. Linklater is going to be looking at facts and figures and how much money was spent in advertising, I thought he could save himself some trouble when looking at the rest of it.

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Norman Doyle

Does anyone from the Bloc require three or four minutes?

Mr. Vincent.

April 28th, 2008 / 4:30 p.m.

Bloc

Robert Vincent Bloc Shefford, QC

My questions are for Mr. Cabana. I will try to be brief and to run through them all in one minute, to allow you two minutes to respond. I will be referring mainly to your speaking notes. You mention recommendation 31 of the Advisory Committee's report and note the following:

At first glance this may appear to provide a simple and immediate solution for enforcement, I wish to echo the words of Mr. Linklater in acknowledging that this issue is very complex.

In what way is this issue very complex?

4:30 p.m.

C/Supt Mike Cabana

Getting back to the comment I made earlier about the RCMP's role in enforcing the act's provisions, the complexity, to our way of thinking, stems from the fact that evidence must be gathering and introduced to the courts. The legislative tools to meet the RCMP's needs are already in place. Adding this specific tool would not help the RCMP address the problem of criminal organizations. It would not help us play that that role. It only adds to the complexity of having to administer investigations currently before the courts and of gathering evidence that is admissible in court. That is what makes this issue complex.

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Robert Vincent Bloc Shefford, QC

How many of your investigators are assigned specifically to investigating immigration consultants?

4:35 p.m.

C/Supt Mike Cabana

At this time, sir, we have no one assigned specifically to investigating immigration consultants. As I explained, we launch investigations at the request of partner departments. The focus of these investigations may be organized crime, corruption or human trafficking.

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Robert Vincent Bloc Shefford, QC

How is organized crime involved? If you have no investigators and receive no complaints, then the organized crime element can do whatever it wants. If offenders are not caught and if no one suspects anyone, you do not investigate, because you do not have the personnel.

What do you do then?

4:35 p.m.

C/Supt Mike Cabana

I am sorry, but obviously, I did not make myself clear. We have investigators who are part of the immigration program.

4:35 p.m.

Bloc

Robert Vincent Bloc Shefford, QC

But they are not available.