I would say no, and that's why we've revamped it. I think what we have is a much stronger process now, because the chair's ultimately accountable for the reputation of the organization. The chair is ultimately the person who has the responsibility of ensuring that the integrity of the decision-making process is respected and that the integrity of the board's reputation is also respected.
The buck stops there. I think, with the benefit of hindsight, the process in the past was multi-layered and a bit bureaucratic.