As I indicated before, the vehicle for providing a check on that is the Federal Court.
The issue of whether there is no credible basis to a claim is a legal and factual question. The integrity of the decision-making process can be undermined if the board is saying to individual decision-makers that you're deciding “yes” too much, or you're deciding “no” too much. Then there is a hidden pressure on them, which undermines their decision-making independence.
That's something that the Federal Court is there for. There are aspects of a board member's behaviour that have nothing to do with their independence and where we need to be more accountable. Adjudicative independence is not a licence to be disrespectful in the hearing room. It's not a licence to make insensitive comments. Those are the kinds of things where I think the organization can do better in the complaints process.