Mahsi cho, honourable members of Parliament. Welcome to Akaitcho territory. As a former member of the Government of the Northwest Territories and the legislature and as a former chair of standing committees that travelled throughout the territories giving public hearings, I understand the challenges that are faced by the honourable members here today.
My name is Steve Nitah. I'm the chief of the Lutsel K'e Dene First Nations. I'll be making a presentation on behalf of the Akaitcho Dene First Nations that are negotiating the implementation of the treaty of 1900.
With me today, along with Chief Ted Tsetta, is Sharon Venne, our technical advisor to the process.
There is a large workshop going on in my community right now—a governance workshop. We flew out of there at five today, and we'll be flying back to Lutsel K'e this evening to continue the workshop tomorrow. So we all have very busy schedules.
The presentation I will give this evening is in two parts: one on economic development, and another on political development that speaks to decision-making in the jurisdiction.
Thanks for giving us this opportunity to speak. We have prepared a statement, which is in the package of materials. I'll give a short summary of the presentation. To the members who are French-speaking, we apologize. We did not have the time to prepare our documents in the French language, but we will provide documents in that language. As Dene speakers, we understand the importance of communicating in the language we are comfortable in.
As I indicated, we are Akaitcho Dene. We number nearly 4,000. There's a map in our presentation. We have an approximate land mass of 468,000 square kilometres, which is, by the way, larger than the state of France. We have the largest non-Dene population living within our territory—that is, the city of Yellowknife—which presents unique challenges and opportunities for us in Akaitcho.
Our forefathers negotiated and concluded a peace and friendship treaty with the crown in 1900. At this time, we are in the process of negotiating with Canada on the understanding and clarification of rights within our territory for Dene and non-Dene alike. We are preparing 17 chapters of the proposed 23 chapters of the Akaitcho agreement. We will table these chapters with the federal government in March 2010. I will return to this later in my presentation.
While we have been busy trying to find solutions, Akaitcho has not experienced a similar benefit. At this time, our territory contributes more than 51% of the GDP of the Northwest Territories. We are the economic engine of the Northwest Territories, but we do not see tangible outcomes from our contributions.
Let me review very briefly, gentlemen, some of the efforts Akaitcho has been engaged in for the development of solutions that support economic development in the Northwest Territories.
In March 2001 we negotiated an interim measures agreement with Canada and the Government of the Northwest Territories. Then there was a ministerial directive to clarify the operation of the interim measures agreement and give further guidance on the issue of permits and licensing within Akaitcho territory.
In November 2006 there was an order to withdraw 1,034 hectares within the city of Yellowknife. It was a unique withdrawal within a municipality. Akaitcho believes that this was the first such withdrawal within a municipality in Canada. In addition, there was a special feature of the withdrawal. There is an opportunity to have an economic project on some of the withdrawn lands. In the three years since the withdrawal, we have not been able to take advantage of this unique feature, since we are unable to get an interim economic package from the federal government, which we were negotiating as a companion to this withdrawal. Unfortunately, there was a change in government and a change in direction.
We would like support from the committee members for an interim economic package so we can take advantage of the specific and unique language of the land withdrawal within the city of Yellowknife. In November of 2007 we withdrew lands for a proposed national park and other lands. This is a further indication of Akaitcho's attempt to provide Canada with a level of comfort within our territory.
The Akaitcho Dene have developed mineral exploration guidelines for companies wishing to conduct mineral exploration activities wholly or partially in Akaitcho territory. The Akaitcho Dene took this step following the Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Taku Tlingit case. In that case, on the issue of consultation, the Supreme Court of Canada said that first nations should indicate the level of consultation they would like to see within their territory.
Well, Akaitcho has been trying to work with industry and government. The federal government put in place a northern economic strategy with the creation of a northern economic development agency. As Dene, we want to be involved in these kinds of discussions when we are providing the stable environment for industry to take place within our territory. We have a lot of questions concerning the new agency set up by the federal government, and we raise three at this point. There are other questions in the presentation package.
First, what was the level of consultation with the constitutional rights holders prior to the government's announcement? None.
Dene chiefs should have been involved from the beginning in shaping the structure and the policy and priorities of this new agency.
Three, it is totally economically driven by the needs of the south. What about the needs and aspirations of the Dene in the north? The development of the agency is in marked contrast to the findings of the Harvard Project. We are raising it in our presentation as it has direct relevance to your work and our work.
Let us turn to some of the key indicators and findings of the study.
One, control of decision-making is essential to economic development. Let me emphasize this point. When a body outside of an indigenous nation makes the decisions, economic development does not work. This cannot be overemphasized.
Two, self-governance alone is no guarantee of success. The Harvard study found that sovereignty was essential. What did sovereignty mean for the study? Sovereignty meant the ability to make your own decisions. The most successful indigenous nations were the ones that could create the environment in which investors felt secure.
Three, what is a good governance structure? There must be a strong dispute mechanism that guarantees people that their investment will be secure. In the Akaitcho negotiations, we looked at nine agreements with chapters on dispute resolutions. Our conclusions were that these chapters are not workable since the dispute mechanisms were not built on indigenous values but rather on non-indigenous values. An Akaitcho independent study came to the same conclusion as the Harvard study.
Four, good governance requires human input at all levels of institutional development. There must be people within the indigenous leadership who can articulate a new vision for the nation's future based on Dene values and beliefs. There must be a willingness to understand and encourage the foundational changes that such a vision requires. There needs to be strategic thinking to move away from crisis management and opportunistic quick fixes toward long-term decision-making that incorporates community priorities, concerns, circumstances, and assets. That means looking at all the indicators and making strategic decisions rather than quick fixes.
Our elders understood the process of strategic thinking, which allowed them to survive in Denendeh. These values must be used and incorporated into the daily decision-making of the Dene.
The Harvard study found that the most successful indigenous nations have good governance structures. The governance models must match indigenous concepts of how authority should be organized and exercised. Institutions and models designed for non-indigenous people and imposed on indigenous nations are a recipe for disaster. The Harvard study found that quick fixes do not work.
What is a quick fix? A quick fix is where decisions are made to solve all indigenous nations' problems rather than building a strong, basic, incremental economy. Most of the quick-fix solutions that were investigated had common problems. Indigenous nations let the federal government make this decision for them. The federal government decided what projects would be funded and what projects would not be funded. This effectively removed the development agenda from the indigenous nations.
There was no strategic work with indigenous nations by the federal government so that the indigenous nations could set their own priorities and think carefully about them.