It's pretty shocking, actually. I'm surprised there's no requirement.
I know this isn't your responsibility, but I just want to be on record as saying how surprising it is that you have something that has a significant mandate, with significant public funds attached to it, hoping to achieve significant results, and there's no final reporting process. That's pretty appalling. I'm hoping that the commissioners will see fit to take that responsibility on to do that.
In terms of the independence in the relationship with the department, I think part of the concern--this is kind of the trust-building part--is that people were hoping to see the secretariat operate quite independently. I respect the fact that there is a need to get information from the department, but it sounds as though, between staff coming over from Indian and Northern Affairs and the absence of any kind of other reporting relationship.... I think there are some optics around the independence of the secretariat.
So my question to you is twofold. One, how are you going to regenerate that trust among the public and among the survivors that your secretariat is independent and operating at arm's length? And two, what are you going to do about the damage control?
Perhaps you could tell me what your plans are to address those issues.