[Member spoke in Inuktitut as follows:]
ᖁᔭᓐᓇᒦᒃ ᐃᒃᓯᕙᐅᑕᓕᒃ. ᓇᐃᓈᓗᐊᕐᒪᑦ ᐊᐱᖅᑯᑎᒋᔪᓐᓇᖅᑕᒃᑲ ᐊᐱᕆᑲᐅᑎᒋᓂᐊᖅᐳᖓ. ᒐᕙᒪᐅᑉ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᕆᔭᒻᒥᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑎᕐᔪᐊᖅ ᐅᖃᖅᓯᒪᒻᒪᑦ ᑖᒃᑯᐊᒎᖅ ᐃᕐᓂᐅᖅᑎᑦᑎᓇᓱᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᐃᑦ ᐊᒥᓱᓐᖑᖅᐹᓪᓕᖅᑑᒐᓗᐊᑦ ᑭᓯᐊᓂ ᐅᖃᓕᒫᕐᓂᐊᕋᒪ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔭᖓᓐᓂ ᐃᒪᓐᓇ ᐅᖃᖅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᓇᓂᓯᔪᐃᑦ 2023−ᒥᒃ ᑖᒃᑯᐊᒎᖅ 80%−ᒪᕆᐊᓗᐃᑦ ᓱᓕ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑕᐅᖏᑦᑐᑦ ᑖᓐᓇ ᐅᖃᖅᓯᒪᔭᖓ ᐃᒪᓐᓇ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᓕᖅᑐᒍᑦ ᐊᒥᓱᒻᒪᕆᐊᓗᓐᓂᑦ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᓂᑦ, ᖁᓖᑦ ᐅᖓᑖᒍᑦ ᖃᔅᓯᑲᓪᓚᒡᓂᒃ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊ ᐃᒡᓗᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒥᓱᓐᖑᒃᑲᓐᓂᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᐃᕐᓂᐅᖅᑎᑦᑎᓇᓱᓐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᓂᒃ. ᐃᒪᓐᓇ ᐊᐱᕆᕗᖓ ᐃᒡᓗᓕᕆᔨᕐᔪᐊᒃᑯᓐᓄᑦ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᐊ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᑎᒡᓗᓯᐅᒃ ᖃᓄᐃᒻᒪᑦ 2001 ᓈᓴᐅᑎᓂᒃ ᐊᑐᓚᐅᖅᐱᓯ ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑮᓇᐅᔭᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖁᔭᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᑖᒃᑯᓄᖓ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ?
[Inuktitut text interpreted as follows:]
Thank you, Chair.
I will ask this very briefly. The Auditor General states that there was an increase in investments but they wrote that they “found that in 2023 80% of needs were still not [being] met”. We've known for decades now and over decades again I say that housing needs have been underinvested.
My question is for CMHC.
Knowing this, why did you choose to use 2001 data to make your allocations?
[English]
