Evidence of meeting #10 for Subcommittee on International Human Rights in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chinese.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Paul Evans  Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Executive Committee, Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada
Sergio Marchi  President, Canada China Business Council
Marcus Pistor  Committee Researcher

12:35 p.m.

NDP

Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

It makes life easier.

Lately, constituents across Canada have been talking to members of our party concerning the situation in China, particularly for Koreans who have gone there. When they had the big famine in 1995, there was a lot of movement there. With the government of the day in Korea, the threat of nuclear action and nuclear development has now caused a lot of concerns.

We thought it appropriate to bring forward witnesses to testify in relation to China, where we're already studying China.

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

Okay. All in favour of Mr. Marston's motion?

(Motion agreed to) [See Minutes of Proceedings]

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

I next have to receive approval from the committee for a request from the liaison committee for $22,900 for operations, including having witnesses appear before us regarding the study on human rights in China. Can I receive a motion to approve this request?

12:40 p.m.

An hon. member

I so move.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

(Motion agreed to)

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

I'd invite people to submit names of witnesses.

Go ahead and speak to this, Marcus.

February 20th, 2007 / 12:40 p.m.

Marcus Pistor Committee Researcher

Mr. Marston, if I could clarify the situation of North Korean refugees in China, would it be part of the study on human rights in China and incorporated into the report, or would you see it as a separate thing?

12:40 p.m.

NDP

Wayne Marston NDP Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

I actually saw it as separate. As I was reading it, it kind of stood out to me the other way, but it was seen as separate.

12:40 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Marcus Pistor

Okay, thank you.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

The clerk has proposed that I mention next week's appearance at this point.

Have we confirmed these four witnesses? We have confirmed Monsieur Mendes and Mr. d'Aquino. What is the status on Mr. Lu Ducheng?

12:40 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Marcus Pistor

The one concern--just to clarify that--is the amount of time devoted to the meeting if we have up to four witnesses, plus we have the session with the officials from DFAIT on the confidential portions of Mr. Burton's report, and there was an agreement to discuss a draft outline for the report on the bilateral human rights issue. That's a lot of items for a single meeting.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

Do you mean the Burton report?

12:40 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Marcus Pistor

There are two separate things. The Burton report involves DFAIT officials. It's an in-camera meeting, but we would need, I'd imagine, at least half an hour. There was also some time to be scheduled to discuss what would go into a draft report on China so that I could start drafting over our two-week break period. That's up to the committee.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

Because Mr. Silva's keen on Professor Mendes, we'll definitely keep him on here. I'd like to strongly press for Mr. Lu Ducheng as a witness. He has a unique perspective we haven't heard. And I don't think Mr. d'Aquino is going to add anything that wasn't already added today by our witnesses. Unless someone disagrees, I—

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Sorenson Conservative Crowfoot, AB

Which Mr. d'Aquino is this?

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

Thomas d'Aquino. He is the president of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives. I don't think it will be a different perspective, but the staff is advising us to trim our witnesses.

Is it all right if we do it in that way?

12:40 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:40 p.m.

Liberal

Mario Silva Liberal Davenport, ON

Would it also be helpful, Mr. Chair, if we could just go for one round of questioning?

12:40 p.m.

Committee Researcher

Marcus Pistor

We could have 45 minutes with Mr. Mendes and 45 minutes with Mr. Lu Ducheng, and then go to half an hour on the Burton report and half an hour on the draft outline. Would that be okay?

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

Yes.

All right. Part of the meeting next week will be this in-camera hearing so we can finally see the very prosaic, edited bits of the Burton report.

Mr. Sorenson.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Sorenson Conservative Crowfoot, AB

On another issue, Mr. Chair, just to let you know, there have been two motions that have been referred from the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, just in the two hours previous to our meeting today. They are, first of all, that the committee refer a request for a hearing on Colombia from the Canadian Council for International Co-operation to the Subcommittee on International Human Rights. The second point was that the committee refer a request for a hearing on Uganda from GuluWalk to the Subcommittee on International Human Rights. That was taken up in the steering committee and passed at our standing committee, that we look at those two subjects.

12:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Jason Kenney

We'll have to do too many in a week to get to all this.

Thank you, sir.

Thank you very much. We will call the meeting adjourned.