I thank you all for your presentations.
From the cattlemen's association, we've certainly heard this in every province, and federally as well. We understand the market that you'd like access to in Japan. Unfortunately, as you can hear from this particular panel, quite often we hear that this deal is about far more than just tariff and non-tariff barriers. The six chapters that deal with the type of trade you're interested in having aren't the issue. It's the other 24 chapters of the 30 that are concerning.
The environmental impacts are very real. The ISDS cases that have been brought against Canada quite often have an environmental theme. We can look at the Bilcon case, challenging the environmental assessment process federally and provincially, and the Murphy Oil case, challenging our corporate social responsibility to the communities that they exist in. We look at AbitibiBowater, and the Lone Pine case for fracking in Quebec. This has tied the hands of provincial governments and our federal government over and over around environmental issues that legislators are trying to improve for Canadians.
This is legitimate. This is absolutely happening, and for hundreds of millions dollars. These cases are being brought forward. It impacts the way that we are going to be able to legislate.
You mentioned the Paris accord. We've had Jacqueline Wilson, a lawyer with the Canadian Environmental Law Association, come before our committee. She said that the TPP environment chapter doesn't protect the environment. It won't likely be enforced, and it's not nearly strong enough to counteract the environmentally detrimental provisions elsewhere in the TPP.
Could you comment on that?