My comment would be that the current government of Ecuador—the president, Daniel Noboa—was elected with a strong mandate to lead until May 2025. Also, the assembly members were elected through a free and fair process, which was observed by Canadian and international monitors and determined to be free.
There is a certain level of instability with respect to criminal gangs that have, as you've seen, overrun prisons and launched some attacks, but the government has gotten on top of those issues in the last few weeks, and we hope the situation will hold.
We deal with a democratically elected government.
With respect to some of the other questions that were raised, I would need to correct one point, about decree 754. It was not found by the constitutional court to be interfering with free, prior and informed consent. Instead, the constitutional court defined the difference between an environmental consultation process and a free, prior and informed consent process, and has asked that the assembly create a law on both of these points, both of these issues, rather than just a regulation. In the meantime, it has allowed the regulation to stand for environmental consultations only, which is what two Canadian projects have used, because they're not in indigenous areas.