It seems to me, sir, when you ask for whom we are achieving this balance or why you are asked to review this matter two or three years hence in order to see if you've struck the right balance, the short answer is you're striking the right balance for the courts, who review your legislation. The courts take into account the balance between the rule of law—which is your concern for living in a society that is properly patrolled, if you will, and made safer by the police—and on the other hand the rights of the citizens, including those who are accused of crimes. It's for them we're working towards ensuring that the balance is struck between the rule of law, which is your concern for safety in the community, and the rights of citizens of this country, including those who are accused of committing crimes.
The courts are the ones, whether you like it or not, who tell you ultimately whether you've struck that balance. And it's their language, “striking the balance”. That's what they do every day, and that's what we help them do every day.