Thank you, Madam Chair, for the question.
I am sorry if I misstated this earlier. To be clear, I do not believe any amendments to the Criminal Code are necessary. We need more vigorous enforcement of the offences that are already there.
As the member pointed out quite rightly, if we craft an offence that is too specific, we may end up creating loopholes, so that if we don't prosecute with such specificity, the guilty might escape on what the public perceives as a technicality, but is really.... Criminal legislation is always strictly constructed and strictly applied because we are dealing with fundamental rights such as the liberty of an accused person.
I would point out that the offence that CanAge and other advocacy organizations propose is exactly the same as the offence of criminal negligence. I can tell you the offence of criminal negligence criminalizes anyone who's criminally negligent who, in doing anything or in omitting to do anything they are obliged to do, shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives and safety of other persons.
This offence is tailor-made to prosecute elder abuse. Long-term care facilities are under legislative obligations to provide for the needs of their clients. If they act in a way that is harmful or fail to act, in a way that causes harm, this offence squarely criminalizes that conduct. Not only would the perpetrator of that conduct be liable criminally, but potentially the organization would be as well, through the use of sections 22.1 and 22.2 of the Criminal Code. That legislation was brought forward in response to the Westray mine tragedy out east. It allowed corporations to be similarly prosecuted. If you want to get at the heart of profit-making, you must prosecute these corporations.
I apologize if I was unclear before. All of the tools are there in the Criminal Code. We need the will and the training to use them to prosecute elder abuse.
Thank you.