I don't know why everybody is laughing.
My question is a serious one. This bill is purporting to make one important change: to replace the term “child pornography” with “child sexual abuse material”. That's an important change. I'm sure that a lot of thought has gone into coming up with those four words, “child sexual abuse material”.
Can you walk us through how you came to those four particular words? Did you look at jurisprudence? Have you looked at what the experts have said, that those are the more appropriate words that should be in the Criminal Code?
Supplementary to that, in your view, are you comfortable that it covers the breadth and scope of horrific material that's available that targets children and, in many instances, uses children? I just want to make sure that we're not missing anything.
Thank you.