Fine.
I'd like to go back a bit. During your last visit on November 29, the second question put to you by the committee concerned a list of organizations considered problematic regarding bilingualism—you were asked whether you could provide it—and what percentage of institutions were not doing their work. I read your presentation at the outset carefully. It is nice, but I'm not satisfied. In my opinion, you have the clear mandate to answer that question and your organization should not flood us with documents we are supposed to plow through by ourselves. I really got the feeling that we were told to go and sort through all of this information on our own.
Mr. Chair, I don't know if this is possible, but I would like to reword that question. I would like us to be provided with a list of those institutions that are performing under par regarding bilingualism, and the percentage of those who do not do their work. I would like the secretariat to give us the answer and not bury us in documents. I want an answer; I believe it is its role to provide it. Once we have that, perhaps we can then make recommendations.
Would that be possible, Mr. Trottier?