I would like to return to two points of order that were made.
Earlier, Mr. Boulerice asked a very legitimate question. We know that in the white paper there are commitments to post-secondary education. That is what we are talking about today, and we want the federal government to take a leadership role.
Mr. Boulerice's question was a good one, as was Mr. Dalton's, who asked why the minister did not decide to convey funds unilaterally. He gave an example that may have bothered my Liberal colleagues, who are not proud of it. But the fact remains that the question is very relevant: why is the federal government not playing its leadership role?