Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I thank the representatives of the three organizations for being with us, but I am going to focus on the Fédération nationale des conseils scolaires francophones.
Mr. Cloutier and Ms. Morand, my questions will be specific, and I am looking for specific answers, in order to cover more ground, if you don't mind.
First, I want to thank you for completing the questionnaire. I would ask that you continue encouraging the school boards to do that, because only three of them have completed it so far, and that is unacceptable. The committee needs this information to deliver the goods, and it intends to deliver something historic. So please, complete the questionnaire.
The main message I am getting from you is that actual school management is very important. I love the information you provided to us concerning school management and questions about programming, infrastructure, funding and student admissions, among other things. Some things are progressing well, including the student admissions, with the case that the Commission scolaire francophone des Territoires du Nord-Ouest took to the Supreme Court having had an effect there. Immigration and the priority given to teachers is going to help a bit to alleviate the staff shortage.
Funding is always a problem, but we must not forget that from 2015 to 2028, it went from $2.2 billion to $4.1 billion, almost double. Where do the problems lie now? I think infrastructure is the main problem, and two things have been identified in that regard. In my opinion, there are some things the government can do, and there are other things the courts have to resolve. The government can do some things, as it has already done, in particular helping with property. You talk about this point, which is very important. I agree 100% that you should be involved in that.
The thing the courts have to resolve is the issue of students. If there is no access to schools, you can't reach the 593,000 students in question.
Do you believe section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms should be interpreted more broadly?