I'll just comment on the point.
The first thing is “activity” is very vague and we're not talking about investigations because, once again, we're talking about jeopardizing operations and operational resources that are in the field. It's a point that's been raised. Again, the two best examples we've heard from witnesses of situations where arguably there are still investigations are Air India and the Afghan detainees. Therefore, we really are talking about operations. If anything, Mr. Di Iorio's point raises our concern of the vagueness of “activity”, because it could be operations and investigations. I know Mr. Rankin wants to address this as well.