The first ones were in July 2022. It was approximately a few days after Mr. Ripudaman Singh Malik was killed in Surrey, B.C. I, Mr. Nijjar and three others in Surrey were immediately given a duty to warn, within days. One of the reasons those duties to warn may have popped up, which is much more apparent now, is that multiple Indian newspaper media outlets had published our names as individuals who may have been involved in the murder of Mr. Malik, which is absolutely just BS at the end of the day, but they wanted to show there was a row in the community.
After Mr. Nijjar's death, I received my second duty to warn. It was also broadcast in the media that it was supporters of Mr. Malik that may have killed Mr. Nijjar. This is the way they wanted to run this whole operation. They wanted to show this was an intercommunity battle. They wanted to remove Sikh leadership from this country. Then they had multiple other threats, and after the indictment in the U.S. opened up, it was very clear it wasn't just going to be limited to Mr. Nijjar, Mr. Pannun and others. It was going to be a whole bunch of other Sikh leadership—in Canada especially—that was going to be eliminated.
Those duties to warn came in multiple forms. I have had regular conversations with law enforcement, with INSET and with CSIS around concerns within the community and, potentially, concerns they may have with me and my moving around the way I do. You get the duty to warn, and for me it was at very interesting times. It was after the murder of two Sikhs in Canada that I received both of those warnings. They've been continuing until now.