Do we have other commentary or observations?
Are there other hands up, Clerk?
Evidence of meeting #31 for Public Safety and National Security in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was information.
A video is available from Parliament.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Jim Carr
Do we have other commentary or observations?
Are there other hands up, Clerk?
Liberal
Gary Anandasangaree Liberal Scarborough—Rouge Park, ON
Thank you.
With the greatest respect to Mr. Perkins, I would disagree. Disclosure of this nature is undertaken strictly at the level of the departmental officials and not at the minister's office or the minister's discretion in any circumstances.
Bloc
Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC
Maybe we could compromise and not have the minister, just his officials.
I don't know if that would please everyone.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Jim Carr
That would be in the form of a subamendment, I would gather. We have to deal with the amendment that's on the floor now.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Jim Carr
Are there any comments about the amendment?
If there aren't, we'll go to a vote. If there are, I'd like to know whose hands are up.
Liberal
Gary Anandasangaree Liberal Scarborough—Rouge Park, ON
Mr. Chair, with respect to Ms. Michaud's amendment, we would be in agreement with that, if that is the will of the committee.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Jim Carr
Clerk, do we then proceed to a vote on the amendment or do we introduce a subamendment as Ms. Michaud has suggested?
Liberal
The Clerk
The subamendment, I believe, was to simply remove the minister and to keep the officials in the motion.
Liberal
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Jim Carr
Let's take the subamendment to a vote.
Clerk, remind us about what the vote constitutes and then call the roll, please.
Conservative
Dane Lloyd Conservative Sturgeon River—Parkland, AB
Can I just move that we have unanimous consent on the subamendment?
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Jim Carr
That's music to my ears. We have agreement and unanimity that the subamendment, as articulated by the clerk a moment ago, shall pass.
(Subamendment agreed to)
We move back to the amendment.
Can you remind us, Clerk, of the amendment we're debating?
The Clerk
Yes. The amendment was to remove both the minister and the officials from the motion. Now the officials remain in the motion per the subamendment, so it gets a little bit tricky here. You're now just removing the minister from the motion.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Jim Carr
Yes, there's agreement to remove the minister. There's no agreement that I've heard to remove the officials; the officials should stay as part of the amended motion.