Evidence of meeting #77 for Public Safety and National Security in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was commission.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Joanne Gibb  Senior Director, Strategic Operations and Policy Directorate, Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Randall Koops  Director General, International Border Policy, Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk
Commissioner Alfredo Bangloy  Professional Responsibility Officer, Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Cathy Maltais  Director, Recourse Directorate, Canada Border Services Agency

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

Glen Motz Conservative Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner, AB

Okay. Thank you.

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Mr. Julian, you have the floor.

12:55 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

My final point is that I think the service standards are very doable. The commission has the ability to prolong them, if it chooses to, but setting those standards necessitates, on the government side, adequate funding of this commission, and we have had concerns raised about the lack of appropriate resourcing.

I think this sends a signal from the committee and ultimately from Parliament that this commission, to work properly, has to be adequately resourced, and a one-year performance standard that can be extended is an appropriate measure to ensure that those standards are met and that justice is not delayed in the case of complaints that come through the process.

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

Thank you, Mr. Julian.

Are we ready to vote on Mr. Gaheer's subamendment?

(Subamendment agreed to)

We now go to Mr. Julian's amendment as amended.

(Amendment as amended agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])

I think it's a good time to adjourn. I'll note for the CPC that you guys are up next.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Glen Motz Conservative Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner, AB

Amendments CPC-5 and CPC-6 are going then? Oh, that's right. They would go, because it was carved out of....

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

NDP-6 has carried, and CPC-5 and CPC-6 cannot be moved. You're right.

1 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Chair, I'm not sure of that, because the service standards were taken out of NDP-6, so I think there is scope for CPC-5 and CPC-6 to be considered.

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

I believe that the problem was a line conflict.

1 p.m.

Liberal

Jennifer O'Connell Liberal Pickering—Uxbridge, ON

Yes. I thought that if CPC-5 was adopted, then CPC-6 couldn't be moved due to a line conflict. It's my understanding that we have to deal with CPC-5.

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

That brings us to the end of clause 8. Let us vote on clause 8.

1 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Chair, I think CPC-5 and CPC-6 can still be considered, and they're in clause 8, so I would suggest that we just start again at our next meeting on clause 8.

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ron McKinnon

That's fair enough.

We'll sort this out here, and we'll carry on from where we left off the next time.

That being said, thank you, all.

Thank you to our officials, once again, for being with us. We look forward to your participation every time, and we are now adjourned.