Mr. Adler was kind enough to say that we should take an economics lesson, and I'd like to give him one right back. In 1998-99, the provincial Liberals were running in Nova Scotia, and they promised that they would build schools through a P3 system. They built 23 schools with three different contractors. All those schools were paid for within seven years of completion. The Nova Scotia taxpayer now still has over 20-something years of paying for those schools.
The Liberals put that in. The PC government under John Hamm got in and cut that immediately, knowing full well the extreme high cost of those schools down the road. At the end of it all, we're going to get those schools for $1 and they probably won't be worth anything. So it doesn't mean that a P3 system, where you go to a public-private partnership, is necessarily always successful.
Waste Management Inc., now in Nova Scotia, controls all the waste in Nova Scotia. When that was privatized, the cost skyrocketed, and it's still skyrocketing, because of the long-term objections to it. So it's not necessarily that the private sector does everything perfectly.
One last thing about unions, Mr. Taylor, is that Polar Seafood had three fish plants in P.E.I. They were going to shut down two of them and keep one open. The one they kept open was the unionized plant. Why? Because the workers were organized. The workers had an investment in that plant, and the company kept that one open because they had a very good relationship with those unionized workers. So yes, there are examples of where unions do very well.
But my question for both of you is this. I find that one of the most frustrating things in this country is that we have 10 provinces and three territories and we put up walls among ourselves. Isn't it true, in your opinion, that one of the major costs of infrastructure and infrastructure concerns is the lack of mobility for workers in all sectors? These provincial trade barriers that we put up among ourselves are historic in nature, and I don't blame any government for that. They've been around for a long time.
If we could knock down some of those barriers and move to something more uniform in terms of regulations, in terms of taxes, and in terms of mobility of workers, etc., would that not bring down the cost of all of this and then open up competition? For example, a firm in Manitoba could bid on something in Nova Scotia. A firm in P.E.I. could bid on something in Alberta. Would that not bring down the cost in some regards?
I thank you both for coming.