Evidence of meeting #13 for Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was witnesses.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

Members speaking

Before the committee

Cadieux  Chief Executive Officer, Association du camionnage du Québec
Roy  Interim Vice President, Strategy, Insurance Bureau of Canada
Richardson  Senior Advisor, Professional Truck Training Alliance of Canada
Omole  Manager, Commercial Policy, Insurance Bureau of Canada
Pierrat  Director of Compliance and Legal Affairs, Association du camionnage du Québec
Webb  Lead Safety Auditor, As an Individual
Chatwal  Chartered Professional Accountant, Tax Specialist , As an Individual
Singh Sahney  Former Owner-Operator and Driver, As an Individual

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

I'll turn it over to Mr. Kelloway, and then I might break, just to make sure we can all look at this, because it is a substantive change.

Mike Kelloway Liberal Sydney—Glace Bay, NS

That's what I was going to suggest—just suspending so we can review the changes.

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Colleagues, I'll suspend again for a couple of minutes, just to make sure this is circulated. It is quite a substantive change. We'll get that circulated. The meeting is suspended to the call of the chair.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

I call this meeting back to order.

Mr. Lauzon, you have the floor.

6 p.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

After consulting Mr. Albas and Mr. Barsalou‑Duval, yes, we agree to adding two meetings to this study, keeping the amendment we proposed at the start: to replace “Driver Inc.” with “heavy trucks”.

Now I would like to propose a friendly amendment. The motion having been amended, I think the next witnesses to appear before the committee might be talking about sensitive subjects. We could give them the choice of appearing in camera. Some might become more emotional when they talk about what they have been through.

I don't know whether my colleagues agree with that.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Do you agree, Mr. Barsalou‑Duval?

Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, QC

I don't see any problem with giving witnesses the choice of appearing in camera, if they want.

Mr. Chair, I will take this opportunity to tell you I will have a sub‑amendment to propose.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

That's perfect, on the first point.

Mr. Lauzon, you still have the floor for the second point that you want to support.

6 p.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

The Bloc Québécois and the Conservative Party have proposed witnesses for the two meetings. On our side, we might intend to propose another witness. I would like us to be given the chance to submit the name of a witness. I would like that proposal to be considered as a friendly amendment.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Mr. Barsalou‑Duval, you have the floor.

Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, QC

I am not opposed to it. From the same perspective, I would propose to add a representative of Canada Post to the witness list.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Right.

6 p.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

That's fine with me.

Yes, we would actually like to hear a representative of Canada Post.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Are there any objections, questions or comments?

6 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna, BC

I have a brief question.

Does Mr. Lauzon know what witnesses he would like to hear?

For the purposes of our discussions, it is important to know the names of the witnesses and how many there would be.

6 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Mr. Lauzon, do you already have the names of the witnesses to suggest?

If not, we could set a time limit. I think Mr. Albas is afraid we would have too many witnesses in a single meeting.

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

My goal was not to add a list of witnesses, let alone to extend the study.

On our side, we absolutely want to finish this study and work on our recommendations. It is just a matter of leaving room to add one or two witnesses at the most.

I don't want to move a sub‑amendment. A friendly amendment would let us add one or two witnesses, if necessary. There might not even be any.

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

Thank you, Mr. Lauzon.

Mr. Albas, you have the floor.

Dan Albas Conservative Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna, BC

I think Canada Post was one of them. Who's the other one?

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

We don't have a name right now, but we should look at it and bring it for the next meeting.

6:05 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna, BC

Right, when there is one.

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

There's only one more.

6:05 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna, BC

In the spirit of collegiality, I agree with Mr. Lauzon.

However, I would like the clerk to write down exactly what I said.

The Chair Liberal Peter Schiefke

We will give him a few minutes to do it. In the meantime, we will take a short break.

I will take the opportunity to say that your French has greatly improved, Mr. Albas. Bravo!

6:05 p.m.

Conservative

Laila Goodridge Conservative Fort McMurray—Cold Lake, AB

We are really proud of you.