Good evening, and thank you very much for inviting me to the hearing on a national strategy for veterans employment after service.
I was a weapons systems technician in the air force for almost 32 years. My trade was working with munitions, aircraft weapon systems and bomb disposal for most of my career.
After I passed the 20-year mark, I started to wonder what I would do once I retired, but at that time, I didn't think much more of it. In 2009, the day came when I was medically released and my 35-year retirement plan went out the window. If you don't think that is scary, let me tell you, it is. A family, mortgage and car payments are normal for most veterans, but now I had to figure out what my next job would be.
I got lucky in some ways. I had a retraining package because I was medically released. Friends who got out for other reasons did not.
I thought I would look at my trade. I know how my trade translates to civilian life. It doesn't, unless you know someone who wants a weapons system on their plane or a bomb made, for I was trained in bomb disposal. None of these translate to civilian life.
As I said, I got lucky. My retraining package worked for me, and I had a 10-year career with Shared Services Canada as a network analyst.
The system as it stands right now only works sometimes. From what I've heard from Gulf War veterans, it's more on the not working side. I want you to hear some of the comments I've received on this subject, because I consulted those veterans.
“Post-release training would be great for some veterans, but for a lot of us, it seems we did not meet the requirements for release date versus program eligibility.”
Another veteran said, “It's a scam. I applied for many positions which I was qualified for. I never received one call, and at the end of the five years, I received a call from VAC telling me it's been five years and I will be dropped from the program, but 'thank you for your service'.”
Another said, “Why doesn't the CAF give papers to show what civilian skills you have when someone gets out? When I was looking for work after leaving the CAF after 27 years, every place I went to said that because I didn't hold any papers that I could show them saying I was or had taken courses in X, I was not able to get a job. This has to change. Yes, I have heard all the reasons why they don't give us papers to say we are skilled or have taken a course that is equal to the skills that the civilian world wants. It is time that the CAF gets on and catches up to 2023 and stops living in the past. They want to know why they can't keep people in the service. They have to start treating all who have civilian skills like real people and not like crap. This plan works if you are still in your 40s, but the CAF and VAC must start thinking outside of the box. Life doesn't stop at 65.”
Wayne Finn wrote, “If you are talking about priority hire or CAF veterans medically released, that system only works if you know someone, from my experience, and having the PSC looking after vets is wrong. Why? If you read the PSECA and the PSER, a CF veteran is to be deemed a public servant while applying for a job, a.k.a. doing a competition. I found that hiring managers hope the vets don't understand the act so they can BS you. Another part is proper accreditation for what we did in the military. For example, in my trade, we operated 15 different cranes. Because I never had the rights for a 20-tonne crane, I never got the job, but if they used the accreditation part of the act, I had two years to get the ticket for that crane.”
He's available, if anyone wants to talk.
Another veteran said, “I applied for a number of maintenance jobs, some with corrections, Natural Resources and CFB base Edmonton. I never inquired about why I was not selected. I always thought they were picking other priority hires. There are a lot of us in the Edmonton area. After paying for the doctor's note, the mountain of paperwork and a poorly designed website, I didn't have the steam left to jump through any more hoops. Maybe they figured I didn't want it badly enough, but for me it was a matter of pride. Having to go crying to them with my hat in my hand is below me. I would rather suffer and feed my kids beans than beg on my knees for a job.”
As you can see, there are not many happy veterans who have been released who have a lot of good to say about this program or how it is handled. My opinion is that this program—or parts of it—has been running now for many years, yet here we are, still talking about it.
From what I have heard in the past, it appears to have two shortcomings.
One is that the CF isn't doing enough in a timely fashion for veterans who are being released when it comes to retraining veterans prior to release, and, two, in paperwork as to what they are qualified for on civilian street. The CF needs to ensure we have the proper paperwork required to prove it, as the government's civil service hiring practices are not being monitored enough to ensure they are following hiring practices for veterans, who don't see any checks and balances in place to ensure the applications are being looked at properly for veterans—