No.
House of Commons Hansard #81 of the 35th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was senate.
House of Commons Hansard #81 of the 35th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was senate.
Peter Milliken Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON
Mr. Speaker, to avoid confusion I think you would find there is unanimous consent to apply the second vote that was taken, that is, the vote on the previous amendment to a motion, not on a main motion, to this particular vote on this particular amendment.
SupplyGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
The next vote is on Motion No. 3.
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Alfonso Gagliano Liberal Saint-Léonard, QC
Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. Let us try again and maybe this time we will get it straight.
I believe and I would like to ask my colleagues to check their voting lists, that the results of the vote on the first motion, the first vote we took that now because of the results of the vote we could apply the first vote to all the remaining concurrence motions, second reading of the bill, concurrence and report stage, third reading of the bill and all the clauses of the committee of the whole should be adopted on division.
Bill Blaikie NDP Winnipeg—Transcona, MB
Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. I am sorry but that was not my understanding. I was waiting for the whip to get up after this particular motion. If we were to do what he suggests, we would end up voting in a way we do not wish to vote, so I cannot agree.
Alfonso Gagliano Liberal Saint-Léonard, QC
Mr. Speaker, on a point of order. I understand what the hon. member is saying. What happened was that on the first vote the Reform did not vote the way we were told they would vote. That is why we could apply the first vote to the other five votes.
Gilles Duceppe Bloc Laurier—Sainte-Marie, QC
Mr. Speaker, I think we could apply the results of the first vote to this one, and the hon. member could apply the same reasoning to the two votes on which they want to vote differently from the series of votes on which we will vote. Our agreement still stands, provided he makes it clear that a negative vote on the fifth vote applies to all votes except two. If he says which two, there is no problem.
Bill Blaikie NDP Winnipeg—Transcona, MB
Mr. Speaker, far be it from me to have been able to predict what the Reform Party would do, or for that matter the government whip.
Whatever is going on here, Mr. Speaker, I just want it to be absolutely clear that the NDP caucus wants to support the motion of the Treasury Board allocating money to VIA Rail and to Industry grants. Then we want to be recorded as voting against the main estimates in their entirety.
SupplyGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
The votes described by the hon. member for Winnipeg Transcona will be recorded according to his statement.
(The House divided on Motion No. 3, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Art Eggleton LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for Infrastructure
moved:
That Vote 10, in the amount of $729,747,000 under the heading Industry-Industry and Science Development Program-Grants and Contributions, in the main estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1995 be concurred in.
(The House divided on Vote 10, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Art Eggleton LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for Infrastructure
moved:
That the main estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 1995, except any vote disposed of earlier today and less the amounts voted in interim supply be concurred in.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Art Eggleton LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for Infrastructure
moved:
That the supplementary estimates (A) for the fiscal period ending March 31, 1995 be concurred in.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Art Eggleton LiberalPresident of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for Infrastructure
moved that Bill C-39, an act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the Public Service of Canada for the financial year ending March 31, 1995 be read the first time.
Michel Gauthier Bloc Roberval, QC
Mr. Speaker, I would like to know, as is usually done in these proceedings, whether the bill is in the usual form.
Art Eggleton Liberal York Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, the form of this bill is the same as has been in past and previous years.
(Bill deemed read the first time.)
(Bill deemed read the second time, deemed considered in committee, deemed reported, deemed read the third time and passed.)
Elwin Hermanson Reform Kindersley—Lloydminster, SK
Mr. Speaker, I just want to clarify for the record that the Reform Party was indeed opposed to all the estimates because we believe fiscal spending by the government has to be brought under control.
SupplyGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger)
It being 11.03 p.m. this House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 10 a.m. pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).
(The House adjourned at 11.03 p.m.)