House of Commons Hansard #51 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was rcmp.
Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC
Mr. Speaker, my colleague forgot to mention how proud he was that the Liberal Party bagman also attended the dinner.
Not only did the Prime Minister's mother and some Liberal big shots take part in the official visit, but the Prime Minister's father-in-law and mother-in-law also attended the state dinner.
Were the Prime Minister's in-laws part of the official Canadian delegation, or were they there because they are related to him?
Dominic LeBlanc LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, my colleague is perfectly aware that Mrs. Grégoire-Trudeau's parents were also invited to the state dinner by the White House, an honour that Canada has not received since 1997.
I must say that we are extremely proud of this important visit to Washington and everything that the Prime Minister and several ministers accomplished during their historic visit.
John Brassard Conservative Barrie—Innisfil, ON
Mr. Speaker, last week, Canadians found out that the Prime Minister's nannies will cost taxpayers over $100,000 a year. He gets this child care benefit while every other Canadian has to fight to pay his or her own way for child care. When asked, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons answered that the Prime Minister needed these nannies, yet the Prime Minister campaigned successfully against this.
The question is a simple one. Why does the Prime Minister feel that he is entitled to taxpayer-funded nannies?
Dominic LeBlanc LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has addressed this very issue on a number of occasions in this House, and again earlier today. The Prime Minister has a family of three young children. With the nature of his responsibilities, it is not inappropriate that two household staff, in addition to performing other duties, also act as secondary caregivers for the Prime Minister's family. Every prime minister's family has different needs and different circumstances, and the allocation with respect to our Prime Minister's family and the expenses of the house are entirely appropriate.
John Brassard Conservative Barrie—Innisfil, ON
Mr. Speaker, it is hard to believe that the Liberals are justifying the fact that the Prime Minister of Canada is getting 12 times more than the average Canadian with three kids will be getting under their Liberal child care plan.
Last fall, the Prime Minister said that millionaires like him do not need the taxpayers' help for child care. Now he thinks it is fine to take money from hard-working middle-class moms and dads so that he can get special privileges.
Why does the Prime Minister think he is entitled to Canadians paying over $100,000 for child care while every other Canadian struggles to pay on his or her own?
Dominic LeBlanc LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, that is exactly the same question the member posed in the previous question. Therefore, I will give him exactly the same answer.
It is no surprise, given that the Prime Minister has three young children. Given the nature of his responsibilities, we think it is appropriate that two household staff, in addition to other responsibilities in the house, also act as secondary caregivers for the Prime Minister's children. All of the expenses of our Prime Minister and his family with respect to household staff are appropriate.
The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan
Order, please. I am hearing a little too much noise. I want to remind members that we each speak when we are recognized, and we speak one at a time. Besides, the folks out in TV land cannot hear members unless the microphone is on in front of them. Therefore, members should keep that in mind.
The hon. member for Saskatoon West.
Sheri Benson NDP Saskatoon West, SK
Mr. Speaker, during the campaign, the Liberals made a solemn promise to save home mail delivery. The Prime Minister himself said, “We are committed to restoring home mail delivery”.
Seniors and Canadians living with disabilities have been counting on the Liberal government to deliver on its promise. Instead, the minister is now saying that everything is on the table. Meanwhile, Canada Post is raking in the profits. There is no excuse for this betrayal. Why are the Liberals breaking their promise to Canadians?
Judy Foote LiberalMinister of Public Services and Procurement
Mr. Speaker, while the member opposite might have an issue with Canada Post being given a comprehensive, independent review, the Canadians who I am hearing from want to have a say. They are looking forward to this consultation process. They really want to know what we, as a government, will be doing in terms of roadside mailboxes. We put a moratorium in place on the installation of roadside mailboxes. People continue to get door-to-door delivery. However, we also need to make sure that we hear from Canadians from coast to coast to coast, and that is exactly what this independent, comprehensive review will do.
Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC
Mr. Speaker, what people want is their mail delivered to their home. That is it.
The Liberals promised to restore home mail delivery, not to put everything on the table. We are talking about a basic public service. Moreover, it is profitable and does not cost a cent in taxes.
For seniors and people with a disability, the Liberal cuts will be hard to swallow. The Prime Minister himself promised to restore home mail delivery.
Why is the government going back on its word today and turning its back on all Quebeckers and Canadians who care about this important service?
Judy Foote LiberalMinister of Public Services and Procurement
Mr. Speaker, we have committed to a comprehensive, independent review of Canada Post. We have committed to putting an end to the installation of roadside mailboxes. The review is under way. Canadians want to have a say. They want us to know exactly how they feel about the services that are being provided. It is a comprehensive, independent review. Who can argue with Canadians having a say in terms of the postal services that they will continue to receive?
Candice Bergen Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB
Mr. Speaker, we have heard from the Prime Minister and the Minister of Public Safety in terms of what the government is doing to help the people of Fort McMurray. However, we have not heard anything yet from the Minister of Natural Resources in terms of the effect the fires are having on oil production in Canada. In light of the fact that six of the largest oil producers have suspended operations, will the minister commit to quickly meeting with the CEOs to find out what they need to get their workers safely back to work?
Jim Carr LiberalMinister of Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, the eyes of the country are on northern Alberta, and so many of us are looking at those who have lost their livelihoods and lost their homes.
We also realize that the oil sector has been impacted to about 1.5 million barrels a day, which is having an impact, but not on prices and not on supply because of the situation in the North American market.
Yes, I am meeting with industry leaders. I will be having a conversation later today with the energy minister from Alberta, and the most important point is that our hearts are with those who are suffering.
Candice Bergen Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB
Mr. Speaker, absolutely, people's safety is of the utmost importance, but it is important that these people know that they have a job to go back to when they can go back home.
They also need to know that the Minister of Natural Resources understands the serious implications of these oil productions being shut down.
Can the Minister of Natural Resources tell the Canadian public and the people of Fort McMurray what actions the government is willing to take, and take quickly, so that it can help oil producers who want to get back up and running and get these people back to work when they are able to go home.
Jim Carr LiberalMinister of Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, I have had and will continue to have conversations with industry leaders. We are looking very closely at the impact of these fires on supply.
We understand very well that Alberta has been hit very hard this year and there have been serious job losses. That is why, as a government, we have responded to that reality.
We will continue to do so, and we will continue to do so knowing that the oil sector will continue to be a very important part of the Canadian economy.
Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB
Mr. Speaker, I am not sure how they responded to it yet. However, Fort McMurray has been home to economic infrastructure that has fuelled our Canadian economy.
In the past few days, oil companies have shut down. The Canadian economy is about to take a huge hit.
A household saves for times of disaster such as the loss of a job or family emergency. In his budget, the Prime Minister has left almost no wiggle room for disasters such as this.
Will the Prime Minister change his current spending habits to accommodate for this massive economic loss?
Jim Carr LiberalMinister of Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, we are aware, as are all members of the House, of the impact these fires are having on the people of northern Alberta.
The Government of Canada, through the leadership of the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness has found a way to assemble all of the resources of the Government of Canada in a unified effort, with the Government of Alberta and with Canadians who have given to the Red Cross, matched dollar for dollars by the Government of Canada, because we know what our responsibilities are.
Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB
That hardly seems like an answer to my question, Mr. Speaker.
However, the fire of Fort McMurray has displaced more than 80,000 people, who are unsure if they will have a home to return to.
Organizations, businesses, and everyday people have come together unselfishly to raise money. In contrast to that, the Liberals took a non-partisan meeting with the official opposition and turned it into a Liberal Party fundraising email.
Can the Prime Minister explain how it is appropriate for the Liberals to take advantage of this tragedy for a partisan gain?
Ralph Goodale LiberalMinister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
Mr. Speaker, from the very beginning, the Government of Canada has been backing up the Government of Alberta every step of the way, together with all the first responders, all the private sector organizations, and the Red Cross, to make sure that every conceivable support was put at the disposal of Fort McMurray and the people of Alberta.
The government operation centre has been on the job from day one, and every agency and department of this government has been thoroughly engaged to make sure that all Canadians stand together, and surely it is a time for that, not this.
Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC
Mr. Speaker, after promising to clean up Liberal patronage scandals, the Conservatives decided rewarding bagmen and donors was the way to go: 80% of the CBC's board, all previous prime minister's appointees, are conservative donors, and just last week one board member quit so he could run to be the Conservative Party president.
The Minister of Canadian Heritage promised an independent process to appoint board members at the CBC, but so far we have nothing.
When will the government adopt a new, transparent, and accountable process for the CBC board?
Mélanie Joly LiberalMinister of Canadian Heritage
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his important question.
As mentioned in my mandate letter, we will make sure to propose a new independent, merit-based process, which will be sure to be open and transparent in order that the public trusts the board of CBC-Radio Canada again.
Pierre Nantel NDP Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, QC
Mr. Speaker, that is all well and good, but it is a little late for the CBC.
Last week, a CBC board member resigned in order to run for the Conservative Party presidency. It is a little awkward.
Are there any others who want to get into politics, or maybe become a senator? There are a number of Conservatives on the board of directors. In about a week, that board will get together to make a decision on the sale of the Maison de Radio-Canada and where the millions of dollars of public money will go.
With that consultation about to begin, does the minister think it is morally acceptable that the Conservative Party hacks will be the ones to decide the future of our public broadcaster?
Mélanie Joly LiberalMinister of Canadian Heritage
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question.
We believe in CBC-Radio Canada. In our budget, we announced $675 million over five years to support our public broadcaster. We are also going to reform the appointment process to make sure that our board members are appointed openly and transparently, on a merit basis.
Darshan Singh Kang Liberal Calgary Skyview, AB
Mr. Speaker, today our thoughts and prayers are with the people of northeastern Alberta. The support of surrounding communities and the tireless work of public safety officials, including first responders, deserve nothing but praise. As the government, we also have a responsibility. I know the Prime Minister and the ministers have announced numerous measures to help support the people and the region.
My question is for the Minister of National Revenue. What other measures are being put in place to help the people of northeastern Alberta?
Diane Lebouthillier LiberalMinister of National Revenue
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question.
The safety and well-being of the people affected by the forest fires in Alberta are our top priority.
That is why the CRA immediately stopped all collections and all these activities, cancelling penalties and interest for those who are unable to file their tax returns or pay amounts owing. We are working with Canada Post to ensure that taxpayers expecting a tax refund or a benefit payment have secure access to their mail.