House of Commons Hansard #55 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was c-14.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Criminal Code First reading of Bill S-228. The bill amends the Criminal Code to explicitly make forced or coerced sterilization without consent an aggravated assault, aiming to protect women, Indigenous women, and marginalized individuals in Canada. 200 words.

Extortion in Canada Pierre Poilievre requests an emergency debate on an "extortion crisis" across Canada, which he blames on Liberal border and justice policies. He proposes mandatory jail time, stronger borders, and clear self-defence laws. 600 words.

Bail and Sentencing Reform Act Second reading of Bill C-14. The bill [xnP89S] amends the Criminal Code, Youth Criminal Justice Act, and National Defence Act to tighten bail and sentencing rules. The government [X4TNeM] aims to strengthen public safety by expanding reverse onus provisions, adding aggravating factors for crimes against first responders, essential infrastructure, and retail theft, and restricting house arrest for serious sexual offenses. The Bloc [D0LKIk] supports sending it to committee but raises concerns about judicial discretion and the presumption of innocence. Conservatives [urGYcO] argue the bill is a "band-aid solution" that fails to repeal "soft-on-crime" policies [0kM28G] and restore mandatory minimums, attributing rising crime rates to past Liberal legislation. 49000 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's costly budget and reckless credit card spending, with the Parliamentary Budget Officer and Fitch Ratings warning of deterioration. They highlight increasing tariffs on Canadian goods after the Prime Minister's trips, declining housing starts, and rising food costs due to the industrial carbon tax. Concerns about surging extortion rates and bureaucratic luxury spending are also raised.
The Liberals defend their generational budget, emphasizing investments in infrastructure, housing, and defence. They highlight Canada's strongest G7 fiscal position and efforts to boost trade and create youth jobs. They also address extortion with legislative measures and support healthcare and cultural initiatives.
The Bloc criticizes the government's inaction on TVA layoffs, lamenting the abandonment of private broadcasters and Quebec culture. They also condemn the lack of support for the forestry sector, citing Arbec layoffs despite calls for wage subsidies.
The NDP presses the government on funding for universal pharmacare and demands a search and rescue base in Nunavut.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Members debate a question of privilege regarding the government's delayed response to the Parliamentary Budget Officer's request for information on proposed savings, with the government citing process and employee relations for the delay. 700 words.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act Second reading of Bill C-221. The bill amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to require that victims of crime receive not only eligibility and review dates for offenders' temporary absences, releases, or parole, but also an explanation of how these dates were determined. This aims to increase transparency and support victims, who often feel unheard or uninformed by the justice system. The bill builds on previous legislation that received unanimous support. 7200 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Rising Food Prices Warren Steinley argues that carbon taxes and packaging taxes drive up food prices, causing an affordability crisis. Wade Grant denies these claims, attributing higher prices to global forces and defending environmental policies as beneficial, not detrimental, to the economy. Steinley cites Sylvain Charlebois's disagreement with Grant.
Fuel tax and affordability Cheryl Gallant criticizes the Liberal government's fuel tax and spending policies, accusing them of corporate welfare and harming affordability for Canadians. Wade Grant defends the government's climate action policies, arguing that they are essential for economic security and a clean energy future.
Fentanyl and meth legality Dan Mazier asks if the Liberals believe smoking fentanyl and meth should be legal. Maggie Chi avoids a direct answer, stating provinces decide on safe consumption sites and the federal government supports communities through targeted investments and enforcement. Mazier repeats his question, but Chi again declines to answer directly.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Fraser Tolmie Conservative Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, SK

Mr. Speaker, I am very familiar with my colleague's community. I was there this past summer, riding through there on the 400. It never disappoints. Unfortunately, he was not there at the time.

My colleague spoke about action. One concern I have is with regard to convictions. He spoke about someone in his community being arrested and released 17 times but never convicted.

What is falling short in the Liberal bill that the Conservatives are suggesting should be adopted by the Liberals? What are his thoughts on that?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Doug Shipley Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for dropping by Barrie in the summer. I welcome all of my colleagues from all sides to get off Highway 400 and come into Barrie. It is a great city. We are always welcoming everybody there, and we will give them a little tour around. We are doing a great job right now. Our mayor is currently cleaning up under a state of emergency, cleaning up what has been left behind and trying to clean up encampments. It is looking quite good. Come by and look at the fine work that Barrie, the Barrie Police and the mayor are doing there. I thank the member for those words about my city.

Yes, I am glad that the hon. member mentioned the tragic incident of the Barrie police officer who was stabbed while on duty at a local fast-food restaurant. He was just trying to enjoy himself but got caught in a situation there. As I had mentioned, the perpetrator had been arrested, just within the past two years prior to this, 17 different times and released on bail. They had over 100 interactions.

Today, we are talking about reforming the bail act. It is amazing. We are reforming something that has been done over and over under the Liberals, but we are not getting it straight. We need to get this right. We need to make sure that the public is safe. We need to make sure that police officers are safe. We need to make sure that criminals, especially ones who have had 17 different arrests and convictions in two years, stay behind bars.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:25 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Mr. Speaker, the bill eliminates the ladder principle when there is a reverse onus at the bail stage.

The Bloc Québécois is questioning this measure because the Supreme Court has never ruled that remand is prohibited.

I would like to hear my colleague's opinion on that.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Doug Shipley Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

Mr. Speaker, I have to apologize. There was a lack of my getting my translator up to my ear in time, so I will just go over some of the things that we are trying to resolve here today. I hope this helps him with some answers.

I would like to highlight that, through 2015 to 2023, total violent crime was up by 49.84%. Total homicides were up 27.75%. Sexual assaults were up 74.83%. Total violent firearms offences were up 116.41%. Extortion was up 357%. Auto theft was up 45.7%. Total sexual violations against children were up 118%. These are just absolutely atrocious numbers. These are all numbers that have happened under the Liberals' watch from 2015 to 2023. We need to take a closer look at bail reform and make sure that criminals stay behind bars.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to speak to Bill C-14, a bill the government has introduced to strengthen bail and sentencing laws. With over 80 clauses, it represents a major step in modernizing Canada's criminal justice system and reinforcing public safety. Today I would like to speak to the House about three of the amendments that aim to protect our communities by strengthening our sentencing regime. These amendments would create new aggravating factors targeting offences against first responders, as well as theft and mischief offences that harm essential infrastructure, and retail theft.

Recently I met with Keegan Gordon and Steve Piccolo of the Coquitlam firefighters, who were here in Ottawa for the annual firefighters legislative conference. Both Keegan and Steve spoke of the need for the protections the bill offers to first responders. An aggravating factor is a circumstance or detail about an offence that makes the crime more serious and can lead to harsher sentences. These factors send a message to the court that certain conduct justifies harsher sentences.

Among these amendments are specific provisions aimed at better protecting our first responders, who face a disturbing rise in violence and threats that happen while they do their critical work. Every day, firefighters, paramedics and police officers put themselves in harm's way to keep our communities safe. They accept that their jobs come with risk, including running toward burning buildings, volatile scenes and the unknown. However, no one should have to accept being assaulted while doing their job.

Risk is part of the job; abuse is not, yet across Canada, the stories keep coming. More first responders are being threatened or attacked while simply doing their jobs. In October, a paramedic in Kamloops, B.C., was assaulted while refuelling her ambulance at a gas station on a Sunday evening. An unknown man walked up and hit her, unprovoked. In March, Greg Stubbs, a paramedic on Vancouver Island, was attacked and seriously injured while responding to a call at an encampment in downtown Victoria, and in Winnipeg, union leaders reported nearly 100 assaults on first responders in 2025 alone, including a firefighter's being struck in the face with a metal pole while on duty.

Our police officers, paramedics and firefighters need to know that their safety matters. Bill C-14 proposes a new aggravating factor at sentencing for offenders who commit violent acts and other crimes against all first responders in the course of their duties. This amendment would respond to ongoing calls to denounce and deter violence against first responders. The proposed amendment would build on earlier amendments, including former Bill C-3, which amended the Criminal Code and the Canada Labour Code to create an aggravating factor when the victim of an offence is a health care worker. Ultimately, this change would ensure that judges consider imposing tougher sentences when violence targets those who serve.

The message in Bill C-14 is clear. If someone targets first responders, they can expect zero tolerance. They would be held accountable for their conduct. Just as we must protect those who respond in moments of crisis, we must also protect the systems they rely upon to do their jobs: our power grids, communication networks and transportation corridors. Bill C-14 aims to do this by enacting a new aggravating factor; this would apply to theft and mischief offences that have an impact on essential infrastructure.

Across Canada, we have seen a sharp rise in thefts and damage targeting power lines, railways and telecommunications networks. These are crimes that may look like property offences on paper, but they can shut down hospitals, delay first responders and put whole communities at risk. According to Statistics Canada, metal theft, which includes copper wire along with other things, such as manhole covers, grew 56% between 2018 and 2022. Bell has documented more than 2,200 instances of copper theft nationwide since 2022, with hot spots in Hamilton, Cambridge, Windsor and Quebec's Saguenay region. In Calgary alone there have been over 40 incidents targeting telecommunications infrastructure, causing more than $1.4 million in damages and repairs. Copper wire theft affects entire neighbourhoods, leaving homes without electricity, Internet or access to emergency communications.

When these crimes go unreported, the danger only grows, putting lives at risk.

Bill C-14 makes it clear that attacks on infrastructure are not minor property crimes; they are serious threats to public safety. The bill proposes an aggravating factor when offences like theft, mischief or robbery interfere with access to essential infrastructure, disrupt its functioning or make it unsafe or unfit for use. If someone steals, damages or disrupts the systems people in Canada count on, like our power, communication or transportation networks, it is a threat to public safety. The bill proposes that our justice system treat it this way.

Bill C-14 would also seek to address crimes that harm our businesses and communities, namely retail theft. When we talk about retail theft, we are referring to high-volume, profit-driven crime. These are thefts carried out repeatedly, often by organized networks, with the intent to resell, barter or fraudulently return merchandise. The government has heard concerns raised by provinces, territories and industry stakeholders about the growing problem of this type of theft.

We have seen media coverage and industry data that show organized retail theft in Canada has exploded, costing billions of dollars, involving repeat offenders and violence, and crippling local businesses. Specifically, the Retail Council of Canada has reported that retailers lost an estimated $9.1 billion to theft in 2024, an increase from previous years, and organized theft has been identified as a contributing factor to several retail store closures. The RCC also reported that approximately 45% of theft incidents in 2024 involved violence against employees or customers. In the city of Vancouver, police reported nearly 7,700 shoplifting incidents last year, an increase of about 12% compared to the year before, with shoplifting in the downtown core up 40%.

Bill C-14 recognizes and responds to this reality, seeking to ensure our justice system treats organized, repeat, profit-motivated retail theft with the seriousness it deserves. While courts have long-considered profit motivation an aggravating factor under common law, this amendment would codify that principle in legislation. Codification is important because it ensures consistency across the country and clearly signals to judges, offenders and the public that these crimes are serious and will be treated as such.

Bill C-14 would introduce aggravating factors at sentencing to ensure our courts recognize the seriousness of these crimes. By highlighting the impact on public safety, critical systems and communities, the law would signal to judges that these offences are not ordinary property or assault cases.

In closing, whether it is an attack on those who run toward danger, damage to the systems we rely upon or theft that undermines our communities, Bill C-14 makes it clear that this conduct is unacceptable and will be treated with the seriousness it deserves. We are standing with first responders, protecting critical infrastructure and supporting Canadian businesses and communities. With these measures, we are sending a simple but powerful message that Canada will not tolerate attacks on its people, its systems or its neighbourhoods.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate my colleague's comments on the importance of our police officers and the work they do to keep us safe.

What does the member think of his colleague from Victoria, who is calling to defund the police?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:35 p.m.

Liberal

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Mr. Speaker, I think all of our systems and first responders need to be appropriately funded and supported.

I am not sure what remarks the member mentioned, but I certainly support continuing the proper funding of our police services and our emergency services in general.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:35 p.m.

Bloc

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. Speaker, during the 44th Parliament, the Bloc Québécois introduced a bill to provide a framework for the use of the Jordan decision, and in particular to ensure that the Jordan decision cannot be invoked for primary designated offences such as sexual offences, murder, kidnapping, gun crimes or terrorism.

I would like to hear what my hon. colleague thinks of this idea.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:35 p.m.

Liberal

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Mr. Speaker, I am not sufficiently familiar with the Jordan principle to respond to that, but I note that in this legislation, we are emphasizing the importance of increasing the severity of sentences for violent crimes and sex offenders, and informing our judicial system that we consider these matters with great seriousness. Judges should be very careful with these kinds of crimes when granting bail and considering release. We are implementing reverse onus provisions for many new crimes as well to ensure that our judicial system has more awareness of the danger that some of these individuals present and that we keep them off the streets.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:40 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I am wondering if my colleague can provide his thoughts in regard to the support for Bill C-14, whether it is from provinces, municipalities, law enforcement agencies or the many first responders. There is a general willingness from Canadians to see bail reform, and an all-inclusive number of people have been advocating for the changes that Bill C-14 would bring forward.

Could he provide his thoughts on how important it is that we respect the many consultations that have taken place? We want to see this legislation pass before the end of the year. Could he provide his thoughts on the importance of getting this legislation through and ultimately passed before the end of the year?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

November 18th, 2025 / 3:40 p.m.

Liberal

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Mr. Speaker, that is a great question. Of course, we have consulted very broadly and very widely with first responders, with police and with legislators across the country to provide the direction we are going in and to get this direction under way.

It is critically important that we pass this legislation soon so we can take the appropriate action in a timely manner. As the member mentioned, it is very critical that we do so before we rise for the break.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

Mr. Speaker, we know the member for Victoria wants to defund the police. I had a conversation at a Remembrance Day ceremony with Mike Lokken, the commanding officer of the depot division, and I wonder if the member knows that this budget cuts $98 million from the RCMP budget.

Did he know when he voted for this budget that it is cutting the RCMP budget by $98 million? The Liberals are asking the RCMP to do more with less.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:40 p.m.

Liberal

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

Mr. Speaker, I know that in the budget, we are making a great many adjustments. One thing we are doing going forward is adding 1,000 members to the RCMP and 1,000 members to the CBSA. As we go forward, we are also adjusting various government expenditures right across the board to make sure we are paying for the right things at the right time.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is time to speak plainly today, because families in Surrey and across Canada deserve the plain truth, not another round of empty words from Ottawa. Over the past months, as I have met with business owners and families across Surrey, Cloverdale, Clayton and Langley City, the conversations have been sobering. Everywhere I go, people lower their voices, look over their shoulder and tell me the same thing: “Tamara, we don't feel safe anymore.”

Not long ago, I hosted a small business round table in my office with several local business owners. One of them runs a handful of small restaurants in Surrey, family-run places where the food is good, the staff knows people's names and the community keeps them alive. He sat across from me, hands folded the way people do when they are trying to stay composed, and I asked him how things were going. He took a moment and said that staff had been followed to their cars, that they had had threats, that they were watching the parking lot instead of customers and that this was not how he wanted to run his business.

He was not angry, nor dramatic; he was simply describing the quiet fear that has settled over too many hard-working families in our community, families that came here believing Canada was safe, stable and full of opportunity. He was sad, and that should trouble every single one of us, because what he described is not normal. It is not the Canada that we built. It is not the future we intend to hand down to our children and grandchildren.

Surrey is facing something no community should ever face. We have seen extortion-related shootings at banquet halls, restaurants, insurance offices and family homes. We have seen respected businessmen murdered. We have seen houses shot at twice in the same week because criminals felt confident enough to return. In neighbourhoods like Cloverdale, neighbourhoods that once symbolized calm, quiet and safety, families are now installing cameras, reinforcing doors and staying home instead of accepting invitations to birthdays and family gatherings. This is not how Canadians should live.

When the Liberal government introduced Bill C-14, people hoped that Ottawa had finally woken up and wanted to fix the mess it had created. They hoped this would be the moment the government understood the scale of the crisis: that extortion, gun crime and organized criminal activity were no longer occasional headlines but daily realities for innocent people. They hoped that at the very least, there would be a sign of courage, but hope collapses when leadership fails to show up. Unfortunately, Bill C-14 does not meet this moment. It is not strong enough. It is not decisive enough. It lacks the moral clarity that a government needs when the safety of its people is on the line.

To understand why we need to look at how we got here. Criminals in this country have learned that there is very little to fear from our justice system. They have learned that punishment is often shockingly lenient. They have learned that the federal government's reforms over the past decade have tilted the balance away from holding criminals accountable toward releasing criminals faster than police can file the paperwork.

The principle of restraint, the rule that police and courts must favour release on the least strict bail conditions, remains intact. Bill C-14 would not remove it. That principle may sound gentle and humane, but in reality it tells violent offenders that the justice system is more concerned about their comfort than our safety.

Mandatory minimum penalties, the clearest signal a country can send that violent crime will not be tolerated, were dismantled by the government in 2022 with Bill C-5. What Canadians need to know today is that Bill C-14 would not restore them, not one. As a result, there is no certainty in sentencing, no clarity and no firm line drawn in the sand.

Worse still, crimes involving firearms, robberies, drug trafficking and even extortion can still be punished with house arrest, not with real jail time and not in a secure facility. This is house arrest in the very neighbourhoods where the victims live. It is impossible to overstate the danger of such a system.

I do not say this lightly: The criminals orchestrating these extortion networks understand our laws better than most members of Parliament. They understand the loopholes. They understand that even if they are caught, the consequences may be minimal. They operate with boldness because the law allows them boldness.

Among G7 countries, Canada stands out for how frequent and fast-growing extortion has become in our national crime data. This is a crisis created by Liberal laws putting violent offenders ahead of victims. Let me repeat: This crisis is the direct result of Liberal government choices, and the numbers speak with brutal clarity. Violent crime has risen sharply since 2015. Firearms offences have more than doubled. Extortion has risen at rates that should alarm every elected official in this country. Sexual assaults have increased dramatically, with women paying the highest price for the government's softness.

This brings me to an equally painful truth: Violence against women remains an afterthought in federal justice policy. I have spoken with women here in Surrey, Cloverdale and Langley who are still carrying the trauma of assault. Some cannot sleep. Some avoid certain streets or times of day, and some feel unsafe in their own homes. When they turn to the justice system for protection, they are too often met with leniency for the offender.

Bill C-14 could have changed that. It could have drawn a line so that repeat violent offenders, sexual predators and men who harm women would face serious consequences, but it does not. It would keep in place the same mindset that lets far too many dangerous people slip through the cracks. It would keep the possibility of simple house arrest for violent predators. It would keep the system tilted toward giving offenders second chances while leaving women to manage the fear on their own.

A government that claims to defend women cannot continue to defend the men who harm them. This is why the Conservative position is so different and so necessary. We believe the first duty of any government is to protect its citizens, not to soften the truth and not to sugarcoat a danger that is staring families in the face. Its duty is to protect.

This means restoring mandatory minimum sentences for serious violent crimes, because a society that will not offer consequences has no hope of restoring order. It means ending the era of get-out-of-jail-free cards for violent offenders. The law must defend the innocent before it comforts the guilty. It also means ending house arrest for crimes that were never meant to be served at home. There is nothing compassionate about allowing a violent offender to live steps away from the people he has terrorized. Firm justice is not cruelty; firm justice is protection.

It means strengthening our border and supporting our police, not with announcements but with action. For too long, criminals have smuggled guns into this country faster than the government has responded. For too long, police have been asked to do more with fewer resources. A safe nation requires a government that gives law enforcement every tool it needs, not one that merely stands at a podium promising to do something someday.

Let me close with this. I often think about my grandchildren and the Canada they deserve: a Canada where children pedal their bikes in their neighbourhoods without fear, a Canada where women walk to their cars without hesitation and a Canada where business owners open their doors in the morning without checking the shadows in the parking lot. We can build that Canada again, but we will not build it with timid, half measures or softened legal language. We will build it with clarity, with conviction and with the courage to declare that safety is not optional; it is foundational.

Bill C-14 is not enough. Canadians deserve a justice system that stands up straight, speaks plainly and puts their safety first, not as an afterthought but as the beginning of every decision. We must place public safety at the very top of the law. Nothing should outrank it. We need to restore mandatory jail time for those who use firearms and for those who commit sexual offences. A nation that will not punish these crimes cannot call itself serious about justice.

We have to end the absurd practice of allowing house arrest for robbery, drug trafficking and firearms offences. These are not minor offences. They are acts that tear the fabric of our communities. When a person has shown time and time again that they are violent, the law must begin from a simple position: that they remain behind bars to keep the public safe. These are not radical ideas. They are the minimum standards of a country determined to protect its citizens.

Canadians are resilient and decent, but they are also tired of watching their neighbourhoods grow less safe while Ottawa proposes weak laws.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

Whitby Ontario

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Mr. Speaker, how does the member opposite justify to the members of Cloverdale—Langley City her stance on this legislation?

This has been acknowledged, time and time again by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, by mayors across the country, by ministers of justice, even in her own province, and by police associations, including the Canadian Police Association, the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police, the Police Association of Ontario, the Ontario Provincial Police Association, the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police, the Toronto Police Association and the London police. These are police associations that represent the rank and file, those men and women who are protecting our communities, day in and day out, who have been advocating for these changes. All of them say the same thing: that this legislation takes major steps in the right direction.

How can the member possibly call this legislation weak? Why will she not stand up for a strong piece of legislation to build stronger, safer communities across Canada?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to call attention to a letter that the public safety minister, Mr. Anandasangaree, just received—

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Gabriel Ste-Marie

I would like to remind the hon. member that we cannot refer to people by name, but rather by title.

The hon. member.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Public Safety just received a letter from the Surrey police today. I would like to quote it:

Surrey is one of the fastest-growing cities in Canada.... What we are now facing—a significant extortion crisis that has emerged in just a few short years—demands swift, decisive, and collective action. No Canadian should live in fear....

It says, “We therefore respectfully request an urgent meeting [between] City of Surrey, local federal and provincial leadership, and senior leadership from all over the Lower Mainland”.

This is a crisis that has not been dealt with, and this is from the Surrey police.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

Liberal

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

A request for a meeting is not—

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Gabriel Ste-Marie

I would ask members to observe decorum in the House.

The hon. member for Repentigny.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:50 p.m.

Bloc

Patrick Bonin Bloc Repentigny, QC

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois is generally against mandatory minimum sentences because they have not been proven to deter criminals from committing crime. What is more, they have been proven to cause countless injustices with respect to sentencing.

Can my hon. colleague tell me whether she has seen any studies that prove that mandatory minimum sentences have a deterrent effect on crime? Is she not concerned about the many injustices in sentencing?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, what we do have is proof that mandatory minimums do work. Prior to their changing the laws, we did not have an extortion crisis or a crime crisis like we have now. The soft-on-crime framework is intact in this bill still. It keeps the culture of release. It offers no mandatory penalties for dangerous offenders, and it refuses to place public safety at the top of the law. What is missing is exactly what Canadians have been pleading for: firm consequences, clear standards and laws that favour the innocent over the violent. Until that happens, until they fix it, nothing will truly change.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:55 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, the member just referenced mandatory minimums. She said that it is proven that they can change behaviour. Can she cite one actual credible report that is based on data that backs up that claim? She said it has been proven. Those were her words a moment ago. I am looking for one actual report that has data in it that backs up that claim.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

3:55 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Mr. Speaker, Canadians are tired of that spin. The government's bills, Bill C-75 and Bill C-5, turned our justice system into a revolving door of catch, release and repeat. Since then, violent crime is up 41%. In my own riding, I have sat across from small business owners who are terrified of extortion and families afraid to walk home at night. They are perfect examples of why the system does not work when we loosen it up.