House of Commons Hansard #73 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was c-16.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act Second reading of Bill C-228. The bill aims to increase parliamentary scrutiny and transparency for international treaties. Proponents, like the Bloc Québécois, argue it ensures a democratic ratification process by requiring systematic tabling, a 21-day waiting period, and committee review for major treaties. Opponents, including the Liberals and Conservatives, contend it would burden Parliament, create gridlock, and hinder the government's ability to respond to global developments, viewing it as a "burden without benefit". 8100 words, 1 hour.

Protecting Victims Act Second reading of Bill C-16. The bill Bill C-16 amends criminal and correctional matters to enhance public safety. It addresses gender-based violence by criminalizing coercive control and elevating femicide to first-degree murder. The bill also protects children from exploitation, strengthens victims' rights, and tackles justice system delays. A key debate point is the bill's approach to mandatory minimum penalties, which includes a judicial safety valve to address constitutional concerns, drawing criticism from Conservatives. 40600 words, 5 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government for Canada's highest food inflation in the G7, which has doubled since the Prime Minister took office. They demand the government scrap inflationary taxes and deficits, including the industrial carbon tax and fuel standards tax. They also address rising extortion cases, forestry job losses, and propose a Canadian sovereignty act to boost the economy.
The Liberals focus on affordability for Canadians, championing the new Canada groceries and essentials benefit which provides up to $1,900 for families to help with living expenses. They highlight their investments in social programs like childcare and dental care, and seek support for the Budget Implementation Act to attract a trillion dollars in investment. They also discuss public safety and support for forestry workers.
The Bloc criticizes the Prime Minister for rewriting Quebec history, specifically his characterization of the Plains of Abraham as a "great partnership" rather than a conquest. They demand he learn Quebec's true history and stop presenting alternative facts.
The NDP demands immediate help for Canadians facing high grocery costs, proposing to remove GST, impose price caps, and tax excess profits.

Petitions

Adjournment Debates

Youth unemployment and training Garnett Genuis cites rising youth unemployment and criticizes the government's plan to limit grant access for career college students. Annie Koutrakis defends the government's investments in youth employment skills, student grants and loans, and apprenticeship programs, arguing that these measures support young people.
Canada-China relations Jacob Mantle questions why the government is pursuing a strategic partnership with China, which he describes as Canada's greatest security threat. Ali Ehsassi responds that Canada is building stronger ties with a range of trading partners and defending key industries, while still seeking solutions with the U.S.
Canada's international trade and pipelines Tamara Jansen questions the Prime Minister's statements at Davos versus his actions at home, particularly regarding pipelines and trade relations with the U.S. Corey Hogan defends the government's energy policies and trade efforts, citing increases in oil production and ongoing negotiations to diversify trade, noting a new MOU with Alberta.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:35 p.m.

Bloc

Rhéal Fortin Bloc Rivière-du-Nord, QC

Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question. I agree with him: The provinces have an important role to play, as does Quebec. The problem that I was raising is that Quebec and the provinces do not have any money. People send money to the federal government, and the federal government says that it will send it back to the provinces, but with conditions, and that does not suit anyone.

We fight for months and years, and nothing gets done on the ground. If we resolve the issue of funding for the justice system, then a lot of the problems will be solved.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:35 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Madam Speaker, first I want to say happy new year to everyone. It is a real pleasure to be back in the House with all my colleagues to do the important work for Canadians.

I will be sharing my time with the wonderful member for South Shore—St. Margarets.

I rise today to speak in strong support of Bill C-16, the protecting victims act, one of the most consequential updates to Canada's criminal code in generations.

As the member of Parliament for Davenport, a diverse downtown Toronto riding with families from every corner of the world, I hear regularly from constituents who are deeply concerned about safety in their communities: parents who worry about their children's safety online, women who tell me they do not feel safe walking alone at night and survivors of intimate partner violence who share their stories of living in fear even after leaving abusive relationships. These are not abstract policy questions; they are lived experiences of people I represent. The legislation would respond directly to their concerns.

Bill C-16 is the third major piece of criminal justice legislation introduced by our Minister of Justice. Last year, in September, we introduced Bill C-9, the combatting hate act, which would protect communities of faith from hate crimes and intimidation. In October we introduced Bill C-14, the bail and sentencing reform act, which would ensure that repeat violent offenders face tougher bail conditions and stronger sentences. Both of these bills have received strong support from the local police in my hometown of Toronto, both from the Toronto Police Service and the Toronto Police Association. They have called for the bills' rapid passage to give law enforcement the tools it needs to keep our communities safe.

I hope members of the House will join me in supporting the swift passage of all three of these critical pieces of legislation. I did hear the good news earlier today that the justice committee is already moving very swiftly through Bill C-14. This is great news indeed. Together with Bill C-14, these reforms would send a clear message that our government is keeping Canadians safe, protecting the vulnerable and ensuring that criminals face the full force of the law.

The statistics around women and girls and gender-based violence are devastating. In 2024 alone there were 100 victims of intimate partner violence in Canada, an increase from the year before. Behind each of these numbers is a daughter, a mother, a sister or a friend: someone whose life was cut short by violence that was driven by control and fear.

We know that intimate partner violence often follows a pattern. It begins with control: Isolating the victim from family and friends, monitoring every move or controlling their finances. Too often this coercive control escalates to physical violence, and too often it ends in tragedy. Bill C-16 would address this reality head-on by creating a new criminal offence for coercive control and recognizing that intimate partner violence does not begin the first time someone is physically harmed; it begins when patterns of controlling behaviour strip away someone's freedom and dignity.

The legislation also would treat femicide, the killing of women because they are women, particularly in the context of intimate partner violence, as first-degree murder. When someone kills their intimate partner as part of a demonstrated pattern of controlling or coercive behaviour, that crime deserves to be treated with the utmost seriousness, and I am so happy that we have elevated this to first-degree murder. I would say that it is about time.

Bill C-16 also would strengthen the criminal harassment offence by removing the requirement to prove that the victim subjectively feared for their safety. Instead the test would be whether the harassing conduct would reasonably be expected to cause the victim to believe someone's safety is threatened. This change would recognize that victims should not have to prove their fear; the conduct itself should be the focus.

Bill C-16 would also address online forms of sexual violence. Technology has created new avenues for sexual violence that our laws must address. Bill C-16 would criminalize the distribution of non-consensual sexual deepfakes, AI-generated images or videos that depict someone in sexually explicit scenarios without their consent. These deepfakes can destroy reputations, cause profound psychological harm and, in some cases, be used to extort victims. Our laws must catch up to this disturbing reality.

We would also increase penalties for sexual offences including the distribution of intimate images without consent, sexual assault exposure and voyeurism. These crimes cause lasting trauma, and our penalties must reflect their severity.

I have spent years working with families in Davenport, and nothing is more important to me than keeping our children safe. The exploitation of children, whether online or in person, is among the most horrific crimes imaginable. We know that child sexual abuse and exploitation material is proliferating online at alarming rates. We know that predators use the Internet to lure, manipulate and exploit children and that our laws have not kept pace with these threats. Bill C-16 would take strong action to reinforce mandatory minimum penalties for people who create, possess and distribute child sexual abuse and exploitation material. This includes restoring 13 mandatory minimum penalties for child sexual offences that were previously struck down by courts.

I know that some people may question mandatory minimums, but let me be clear: When it comes to predators who prey on children, who create and distribute images of their abuse, there must be consequences. In the rare circumstances where applying a mandatory minimum sentence would be grossly disproportionate, courts would still have the discretion to impose an alternate term of imprisonment, but jail time would be kept for people convicted of those heinous crimes.

We would also toughen laws to crack down on child luring and online sextortion, making it illegal to threaten to distribute child sexual abuse material. This directly responds to the devastating rise in sextortion cases where predators target children online, manipulate them into sending explicit images and then threaten to share those images unless the child complies with further demands.

Bill C-16 would also criminalize the distribution of bestiality depictions used by predators to manipulate and exploit children, and we would also create a new offence targeting adults who recruit, pressure or counsel children to commit crimes, protecting our youth from being exploited into criminal activity, something I hear a lot about in my home community of Davenport. Finally, we would strengthen the obligations on Internet service providers under the mandatory reporting act to combat the distribution of child sexual abuse material. Online platforms must be part of the solution.

For too long, our justice system has retraumatized victims. Bill C-16 would create new rights for victims, including the right to be treated with respect and to have timely resolution of their cases considered. We would make testimonial aids automatically available, improving access to information and raising the bar for defence attorneys to access the therapeutic records and personal communications of victims. As the federal ombudsperson for victims of crime reported, victims of sexual violence deserve better.

With respect to court delays, we are requesting courts to consider alternatives to stays of proceedings, while streamlining procedures. We are encouraging diversion for low-risk cases to free up resources for more serious violent crimes, because justice delayed is justice denied.

I want to bring this back to my constituents in Davenport. In my riding, there are women who are afraid to leave abusive relationships because they do not believe the justice system will protect them. There are children who are being targeted by online predators. There are seniors who have been victims of extortion and intimidation. These Canadians deserve a justice system that protects them, treats them with dignity and holds perpetrators accountable. That is what Bill C-16 would deliver, not perfectly, because no single piece of legislation can solve all of the challenges our justice system has, but meaningfully and substantively.

I recognize there will be debate about specific provisions. As the bill, I hope, proceeds to committee, I encourage all members to engage constructively and to propose amendments that would strengthen the legislation. We cannot do nothing. We cannot continue to read about women killed by intimate partners. We cannot continue to read about children exploited online and about violent offenders reoffending after release.

Bill C-16 is about values. It values victim safety over predator convenience, recognizes intimate partner violence as a serious crime and would ensure that children grow up free from exploitation. Every Canadian deserves to live free from violence and fear. Every child deserves to grow up safe. Every victim deserves to be heard and respected. The legislation would move us closer to that Canada. Let us send a clear message: Violence against women and children will not be tolerated, predators will face consequences and victims will be heard, respected and protected.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:45 p.m.

Conservative

Tako Van Popta Conservative Langley Township—Fraser Heights, BC

Madam Speaker, among other things, this bill introduces the concept of femicide, which is in response to a shocking rise in intimate partner violence in Canada. Effectively, that provision of Bill C-16 would elevate what might otherwise be second-degree murder to first-degree murder if done in the context of intimate partner violence.

I think we are signalling that we are going to agree with this, but I wonder if the member could comment on whether it would survive an inevitable Charter of Rights challenge.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:45 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Madam Speaker, the protecting victims act, Bill C-16, would be one of the most significant updates to Canada's criminal justice system in generations. I heard there are concerns on the other side about there being a court challenge. As the minister said this morning, he has taken into consideration what has happened in the Supreme Court. This has provided some guidance on how we can avoid these types of constitutional challenges in the future.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:45 p.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski—La Matapédia, QC

Madam Speaker, I listened to my colleague's speech, and a fairly simple question came to mind.

Bill C-16 seeks to put an end to automatic dismissals of cases under the Jordan decision, which was handed down 10 years ago. Who has been in power for the past 10 years? It has been the same Liberal Party all that time. My question is quite simple: Why did the government wait 10 years to fix a problem that we already knew about 10 years ago?

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:45 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Madam Speaker, I think this year is going to be a year of action. I want to say to the hon. member that I was very hopeful when I heard some of the speeches this morning. There is a spirit of co-operation, a spirit of positivity and a spirit that shows we will work together to make sure we are passing legislation that will protect Canadians.

I am very proud of the legislation being introduced today, and I hope all members will pass it quickly through the House.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:45 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Speaker, I am very concerned as well. I am glad to see Bill C-16 debated in this place after having been introduced in December. I think we need to move more quickly on legislation. We have not had a very full legislative package since the election. This is one bill I feel very strongly about.

I want to say a name out loud here. She is one of the more recent victims of alleged intimate partner violence. Her former husband is awaiting trial. I want to say the name of Laura Gover, who died not long ago in Saanich. She was a mom. She was much loved in the community and a victim, we believe, of intimate partner violence.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:45 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Madam Speaker, I want to thank the hon. member for recognizing this extraordinary woman.

I am going to repeat something the minister said this morning after he gave his speech. There is work behind Bill C-16, which, as I mentioned before, would be one of the most significant updates to Canada's criminal justice system. It is very aggressive in ensuring that we modernize the Criminal Code to respond to the most contemporary threats, to intervene earlier, to prevent violence and to make sure the justice system works faster and more fairly for victims and survivors. This work was not just done because we talked to a number of legislators. This is because of the work of the status of women committee. This is because of the work of advocate groups. This is because of all the victims of violence in this country.

It is perhaps too long in the making, but it is finally here. Let us get going and let us pass this legislation.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1:50 p.m.

Liberal

Jessica Fancy-Landry Liberal South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Madam Speaker, I rise today in complete support of Bill C-16, the protecting victims act, and to speak about why this legislation matters so much. It is profoundly important to people in Nova Scotia and in my riding of South Shore—St. Margarets.

I am also going to speak today as a former educator and high school principal. Everyone in this chamber can imagine some of the things I have seen in my riding in regard to children.

This bill represents one of the most significant updates to Canada's criminal justice system in generations. It is broad in scope, but its purpose is clear: to respond to modern forms of violence and exploitation, to intervene earlier, to protect victims and survivors, and to ensure our justice system works faster and more fairly. Bill C-16 does this through its four pillars: tackling gender-based violence and intimate partner violence; protecting children from predators; strengthening victims' rights; and addressing court delays.

That work is urgently needed in Nova Scotia. Our province has some of the highest rates of gender-based violence in the country. Intimate partner violence, criminal harassment and coercive control are persistent realities, particularly in the rural and coastal communities I help represent. In recognition of this, Nova Scotia became the first province in Canada to declare intimate partner violence an epidemic. That declaration reflected what survivors, advocates and frontline workers already knew. This violence is systemic, patterned and too often predictable.

Bill C-16 meets that reality head-on. Under its first pillar, the bill takes decisive action that would prevent violence before it becomes lethal. For the first time in Canadian law, it would create a new offence for a pattern of coercive and controlling conduct toward an intimate partner. Survivors have told us repeatedly that abuse is rarely about one single incident. It is about isolation, intimidation, surveillance, financial control and psychological manipulation. These patterns strip away safety and autonomy long before physical violence appears. By naming coercive control as a criminal offence, Bill C-16 would give law enforcement and the courts a tool to intervene earlier, when lives can still be saved.

This bill also recognizes the severity of violence driven by control and fear. It would provide that murders committed in the context of coercive control, sexual violence, human trafficking or hate are femicides committed against a woman and would be treated as first-degree murders, even where traditional planning and deliberation are difficult to prove. This reflects the lived reality of many intimate partner homicides that are not spontaneous acts but rather the end point of long, documented patterns of abuse. This bill would further require courts to consider life imprisonment for manslaughter committed in those same circumstances.

These reforms closely align with the work being done on the ground by organizations like the Be the Peace Institute in Nova Scotia. Be the Peace focuses on root causes of gender-based violence, unequal power, rigid gender norms and systems that fail to centre survivors. This trauma-informed, feminist and intersectional approach reminds us that prevention requires structural change, not just punishment after harm has occurred. Bill C-16 reflects the same understanding by recognizing patterns of control and exploitation as violence in their own right.

I am also proud to have served on the board of directors of the Second Story Women's Centre in my riding, which supports women, girls and gender-diverse people across the south shore. The Second Story Women's Centre provides counselling, advocacy, safety and support within its community. I have seen first-hand how many survivors endure years of coercive control, which has never quite fit legal definitions before. Bill C-16 would help close that gap by aligning the Criminal Code with the realities that survivors and frontline workers have always understood. It would modernize the offence of criminal harassment. It would remove the requirement that a victim must prove they subjectively fear for their safety, and replace it with a reasonable personal standard.

This change matters. It matters deeply for victims who are stalked, monitored or intimidated, and for those whose fears have been minimized or questioned in the past.

In terms of my being an educator of youth, under the second pillar, Bill C-16 would strengthen protections for children and youth, particularly in an increasingly digital world. As a former educator, I want to speak clearly about this. In classrooms, we see the consequences of online exploitation every day: anxiety, shame, isolation and fear.

The bill would update the Criminal Code to address harms that barely existed when many of our laws were written. It would expand the offence of non-consensual distribution of intimate images to include AI-generated sexual deepfakes, recognizing how technology is being weaponized against young people, especially young girls. It would criminalize threats to distribute sexual abuse material. It would directly address sextortion, which is one of the fastest-growing forms of online exploitation of children.

Bill C-16 would also expand child-luring and sextortion offences. It would create a new offence for recruiting a person under 18 into criminal activity. This is something I have seen hands-on, with boots on the ground, during my time as a principal. The bill seeks to strengthen mandatory reporting and data-driven preservation obligations for online service providers. These measures reflect how predators groom, manipulate and exploit children today, often across multiple platforms and jurisdictions. The bill would restore mandatory minimum penalties for child sexual offences while adding a safety-valve clause to ensure constitutional fairness. This would respond to years of legal uncertainty that weakens deterrence and accountability for the most serious crimes committed against children.

The third pillar of Bill C-16 focuses on strengthening victims' rights. The bill would enhance the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights by affirming that victims be treated with respect, courtesy, compassion and fairness. “Fairness” is a key word. The bill would provide victims with information proactively, without requiring them to navigate complex systems or make formal requests. It would expand access to testimonial aids, clarify victims' rights in order to protect impact statements at sentencing and parole, and improve information sharing under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act.

These changes respond directly to what victims have been telling us on all sides of this chamber: The justice system can be retraumatizing, confusing and isolating. Organizations in my riding like Thriving Twogether, a grassroots non-profit working in southwestern Nova Scotia, see this every day. Thriving Twogether supports individuals and families affected by gender-based violence, addiction and human trafficking, recognizing—

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

2 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

I am sorry to interrupt the member.

The member will have an opportunity to finish her speech and answer questions after question period.

Jesse FlisStatements by Members

2 p.m.

Liberal

Karim Bardeesy Liberal Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honour a long-time member of this House, Jesse Flis, who died earlier this month at the age of 92.

Jesse lived to serve. Born in Saskatchewan to Polish immigrant parents, for more than two decades he served our community as an educator, including as principal of Argentina Public School, now Garden Avenue Junior Public School, in our riding.

In 1979, Jesse heard the call to public service. He was elected four times to serve the people of Parkdale—High Park. In his almost 15 years as our Liberal member of Parliament, Jesse was a champion of human rights, in particular, for the emancipation of Polish people during their struggle against communism. He was a driving force for the recognition of National Flag of Canada Day, for a flag whose 61st birthday we will celebrate on February 15.

After his retirement, Jesse served as chair of Copernicus Lodge on Roncesvalles Avenue, serving seniors, especially of Polish background, with their health care needs.

Jesse did all things in our riding and in this place with a strong spirit of mutual respect and a love of Canada. He leaves his wife, Sophie, and a large family, including his eight great-grandchildren. With them, we share our condolences and our thanks for sharing Jesse Flis with us.

65th Wedding AnniversaryStatements by Members

January 26th, 2026 / 2 p.m.

Conservative

Dave Epp Conservative Chatham-Kent—Leamington, ON

Mr. Speaker, on February 4, my parents, Abe and Susan Epp, will celebrate their 65th wedding anniversary.

The world has changed in extraordinary ways since 1961. Humanity has landed on the moon and has survived the Cold War, Canada adopted its flag, and global adoption of the Internet and mobile phones has transformed how people connect, work and understand the world. Daily life today would be nearly unrecognizable to the young couple who began their journey all those years ago.

Changes often arrive faster than anyone expects. While technology and all facets of society have shifted, my parents built a life rooted in commitment, adaptability and love. Their story reminds us that while the world may change at breathtaking speed, the values that truly matter, partnership, resilience and care for one another, can endure and still give us hope and optimism for what lies ahead.

I ask my colleagues to please join me as I congratulate my parents on 65 years of space travel, smart phones and surviving each other.

William Joseph SeifriedStatements by Members

2 p.m.

Liberal

Dominique O'Rourke Liberal Guelph, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise to honour a hero, William Joseph Seifried.

Bill joined the army at 18 and trained as a gunner at Petawawa, but when he deployed to London, England, new recruits were made infantry. Bill became a Regina Rifle and, without training, was sent to the front in France. He fought through France, Belgium and the Netherlands and then served as a reconnaissance scout in Germany. By quickly returning a grenade, Bill saved his platoon at the Leopold Canal.

In peace as in war, Bill's service and kindness never wavered. He gave his all to his family, his community and his comrades at the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 234, where he was a member for 78 years.

In 2024, Bill proudly represented the Regina Rifles at the unveiling of a rifleman statue in Normandy with Her Royal Highness Princess Anne.

On May 3, 2025, he celebrated his 100th birthday at the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Netherlands. Seeing this country peaceful touched him deeply.

On December 22, Bill passed away. Canada thanks William Joseph Seifried. We remember.

Human Rights in IranStatements by Members

2 p.m.

Conservative

Vincent Ho Conservative Richmond Hill South, ON

Mr. Speaker, today I rise in solidarity with the brave people of Iran.

Over the past few weeks, hundreds of thousands of Canadians have joined solidarity rallies across the country, including in Richmond Hill, where tens of thousands have gathered, braving the cold winter storms to stand on the side of freedom.

In recent weeks, tens of thousands of Iranians have been massacred, with many more injured and arrested by a regime that rules through fear: the fear of speaking, assembling and simply being free. Yet despite the executions, the beatings, the blackouts and the bullets, the Iranian people continue to stand. They refuse to be silenced, knowing the cost but believing freedom is worth it.

The regime can shut down the Internet, but it cannot shut down courage. It can imprison demonstrators, but it cannot imprison hope. Yet here at home, the Liberals offer empty words instead of action. The people of Iran are not alone. The world sees them. Canada's Conservatives and Canadians stand with them. Their struggle is just, their sacrifice will not be in vain, and their future belongs to them, not the tyrants.

Today, the world watches. Tomorrow rises a free Iran, an Iran whose future belongs to its people.

Human Rights in IranStatements by Members

2:05 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

I would remind the member that we are not supposed to be using props.

Government PrioritiesStatements by Members

2:05 p.m.

Liberal

Carlos Leitão Liberal Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC

Mr. Speaker, after a few weeks away in our ridings and after a break from the parliamentary session, we are back in the House of Commons ready for a new year of work. I wish all my colleagues in the House a happy new year.

In 2025, we delivered concrete results: a more resilient economy, strategic investments to strengthen our industries and clear measures to protect Canada's interests. We made a choice to act. We are strengthening our economic sovereignty and supporting innovation here at home.

As this session resumes, the message is simple: We will carry on. We will carry on investing, we will carry on protecting our country, and we will carry on building Canada strong.

International TradeStatements by Members

2:05 p.m.

Conservative

Randy Hoback Conservative Prince Albert, SK

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe for not letting the Prime Minister sacrifice canola and pulse producers. Saskatchewan farmers know that market access to China has been low on the list of priorities for the Liberals. Thankfully, the premier understands a simple truth. If we want to grow the Canadian economy, we must sell to the world. While the premier has done his part, the same cannot be said for the Liberal government. Trade deals are as strong as the logistic networks supporting them. Exporters continue to face congested ports, limited rail capacity and aging infrastructure.

Years of underinvestment and regulatory delays have made Canada an unreliable supplier in the eyes of our trading partners. If the Prime Minister truly believes in expanding access to global markets, he must commit to serious, sustained modernization of our ports, rails and export infrastructure. Saskatchewan knows how to sell to the world. The government must now do its part to expand markets.

Human Rights in IranStatements by Members

2:05 p.m.

Liberal

Jenna Sudds Liberal Kanata, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the extraordinary courage of the Iranian people, who continue to stand for their dignity, their freedoms and their fundamental right to determine their own future. The Iranian regime's brutal use of violence, arbitrary detention and intimidation against peaceful protesters must end. In Canada, many Iranian Canadians are watching these events unfold and are heartbroken, worried for loved ones, grieving for those lost and longing for a future free from fear.

Canada's position is unequivocal. We condemn the Iranian regime's ongoing abuses and are in close coordination with our international partners to hold those responsible to account.

The people of Iran and Iranian communities here in Canada are not alone. Canada stands with them. We hear their voices, and we will not look away.

JusticeStatements by Members

2:05 p.m.

Conservative

Andrew Lawton Conservative Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, ON

Mr. Speaker, tens of thousands of Canadians have been reaching out to members of Parliament over the winter break to tell the Liberals to set aside their divisive and toxic Bill C-9 and to stand up for the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians.

I am pleased to report that today at the justice committee, we were finally able to get the Liberals to agree to set aside the divisive bill and focus on addressing real crime affecting communities across the country. Canadians have been demanding real action: fixing the broken Liberal bail system, addressing the rise in car thefts and extortion and going after people who are wreaking havoc on streets in the country, not people who dare to express a religious belief the government finds objectionable. Conservatives stand ready as always and look forward to working to fix the broken justice system in Canada. I am glad the Liberals finally joined us.

Jean DorionStatements by Members

2:05 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Mr. Speaker, Quebec has lost a great patriot. Jean Dorion passed away after a lifetime devoted to Quebec independence.

Early on, Jean Dorion was an activist with the Rassemblement pour l'indépendance nationale and a founding member of the Parti Québécois. He served as chief of staff under René Lévesque and was responsible for key portfolios, such as immigration and the enforcement of the Charter of the French Language. He served as president of the Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Montréal, where I had the honour of working alongside him. He represented our nation as Quebec's delegate to Japan and as a member of the Bloc Québécois here in Ottawa.

Jean Dorion spent his entire life fighting for our language and culture, and for a Quebec that opens its arms to everyone. On behalf of the Bloc Québécois, I would like to offer my condolences to his wife, his five children and all the separatist activists who are now continuing his quest to make Quebec a country.

Canadian SovereigntyStatements by Members

2:10 p.m.

Liberal

Eric St-Pierre Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to welcome members back to the House and to mark the beginning of the new year.

We are living in a time of profound global uncertainty. International rules are being challenged, long-standing institutions are under strain, and we are witnessing the emergence of power vacuums and growing instability across regions. In moments like these, Canada must be clear about who we are and what we stand for. The House must come together, above partisanship, to defend the sovereignty and independence of nations.

Residents in my riding of Honoré-Mercier have been clear that Canada or Greenland or Denmark belong to them and to them alone. We must stand firm in defence of our sovereignty. Canada will always remain a proud independent nation because, as the Prime Minister reminded us, we have the capacity “to build our strength at home and to act together.” Canada thrives because we are Canadian. I call on all members of the House to act together to defend Canada's sovereignty.

Government PrioritiesStatements by Members

2:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister recently flew to Davos, where he spoke to global elites at the World Economic Forum, and he said that a country unable to feed itself, fuel itself and defend itself has few options. Here at home, Canadians need action, not carefully crafted speeches. Food inflation is up over 6%, and a record number of Canadians line up to use a food bank every single month, despite those empty words.

The Liberals fast-tracked Bill C-5 to get major projects built, and yet nothing has been built, and the hope of a pipeline is fading very fast. Our armed forces are under-equipped and in the midst of a recruiting crisis after 10 years of woke Liberal policies.

Talk is cheap. Canadians deserve real action, not carefully crafted words for the elites at Davos.

Public SafetyStatements by Members

2:10 p.m.

Liberal

Kristina Tesser Derksen Liberal Milton East—Halton Hills South, ON

Mr. Speaker, recently I held a town hall in my riding to discuss our government's proposed legislation regarding public safety, including Bill C-14. The discussion was frank, emotional and deeply personal. It was clear that my constituents want action. They are concerned about public safety, they expect results, and they expect Parliament to do its job. Many residents asked why progress has stalled and why bills remain tied up in committee. They are frustrated, and they are right to be.

Our government is responding to real concerns raised by communities, victims and law-enforcement personnel. The delays are occurring in committee, where an opposition party has chosen obstruction over collaboration. Prolonged procedural delays and filibustering do not make communities safer. They do not help victims. They do not reflect the urgency that Canadians are demanding.

Canadians are asking us to work together and to deliver results. Bill C-14 is one important step toward strengthening public safety, and it deserves to move forward. It is time for the opposition to work constructively in committee so that Parliament can deliver the action our communities are demanding.

Cost of FoodStatements by Members

2:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly Block Conservative Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, SK

Mr. Speaker, while the Prime Minister delivered his speech pointing out the gaps between rhetoric and reality on the world stage, the reality here at home is that Canadians cannot eat speeches.

Our food inflation is the highest in the G7, and the bill is in: Food costs are now up 6.2%, with groceries up 5% and restaurant meals up 8.5% year over year. The Prime Minister's $78-billion deficit has turned Canada into the food inflation capital of the G7. Instead of delivering affordability, he insists on blaming tariffs from the U.S., which do not even apply to food costs in Canada. A quarter of Canadian households are considered food insecure, with over two million people visiting food banks in Canada monthly. Now it is estimated that a family of four will pay $1,000 more this year to eat.

One thing is clear. Only Canada's Conservatives would put an end to the Liberals' food—

Cost of FoodStatements by Members

2:10 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

The hon. member for Longueuil—Saint-Hubert.