House of Commons Hansard #92 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was iran.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Export and Import Permits Act Second reading of Bill C-233. The bill aims to amend the Export and Import Permits Act to close dangerous loopholes in Canada's arms export regime, particularly the exemption for exports to the United States. Supporters argue it ensures Canada's international obligations and prevents human rights violations. Opponents, including the Bloc and Conservatives, warn it is too rigid, could harm Canadian industry, and strain alliances and the crucial defence relationship with the U.S. 6900 words, 1 hour.

Government Business No. 6—Proceedings on Bill C-9 Members debate a motion to expedite Bill C-9, which aims to combat hate propaganda, hate crimes, and protect access to religious sites. Liberals and the Bloc Québécois support the motion, citing Conservative filibustering and the urgent need to address rising hate-motivated violence. Conservatives oppose limiting debate, arguing the bill, particularly the removal of the religious exemption, threatens freedom of religion and expression, and that the government is censoring discussion on a "censorship bill." 15800 words, 2 hours.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government's economic policies, including the fuel standard and industrial carbon tax, for driving record inflation and shrinking the economy. They demand action on rising food costs. The party also raises concerns about national security, calling for the deportation of IRGC members and supporting energy development.
The Liberals emphasize Canada's strong economy and its role as an energy superpower, citing record oil production and critical mineral investments. They promote affordability through tax cuts, social programs like child care and the Canada groceries and essentials benefit, and modernizing benefit delivery. The party also addresses national security and the removal of IRGC members.
The Bloc criticizes the Cúram software for its cost overruns, impacting 85,000 seniors, and demands an independent public inquiry. They also seek social licence for rail expropriations.
The Greens criticize Canada's foreign policy for supporting illegal attacks by the United States and Israel against Iran.

Canada Post Corporation Act First reading of Bill C-262. The bill aims to modernize and standardize direct-to-consumer shipping of Canadian wine, beer, and spirits across provincial borders, creating a national framework to replace current provincial rules. 300 words.

Petitions

Build Canada Homes Act Second reading of Bill C-20. The bill aims to establish Build Canada Homes, a Crown corporation, to increase affordable housing supply and promote efficient building techniques. The Liberal government states it will fast-track construction, use federal lands, and leverage partnerships, backed by a $13 billion investment. Conservatives criticize it as a fourth bureaucracy that will not solve the housing crisis, citing past Liberal failures and proposing tax cuts and reduced red tape instead. The Bloc Québécois argues housing is provincial jurisdiction and advocates for unconditional federal transfers to Quebec. 26100 words, 3 hours.

Iran and the Middle East Members debate the hostilities in Iran and the Middle East and their impact on Canadians abroad. The Liberals emphasize de-escalation, civilian protection, and consular support for Canadians, while Conservatives criticize the government's "incoherent and contradictory" position on U.S. air strikes. The Bloc Québécois stresses the importance of consulting allies and preparing contingency plans, and the NDP condemns the strikes as illegal under international law, urging a return to diplomacy. 31600 words, 4 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON

Mr. Chair, perhaps I did not do a good job of painting the complexities, but that is precisely my point: Iranians have tried to do everything within their power to change this thuggish regime. This is a regime that is hell-bent on brutalizing Iranians and has no respect for human rights. That is precisely why I would say that 95% of Iranian Canadians and 80% of Iranians would like nothing better than an end to this regime.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

Mr. Chair, my colleague clearly has a parliamentary secretary's file on the specific issue of Canada-U.S. relations. I know, having travelled with him before, that he has contacts with the Americans. The relationship with the Americans is important, but that does not mean that we have to take them at their word, follow their every move and repeat everything they say.

Once upon a time, under the leadership of the Obama administration, an agreement was reached with Russia, China, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the United States and Iran. The agreement on Iran's nuclear program worked. It resulted in Iran disposing of 95% of its uranium and inspectors being able to access nuclear power plants without any problems. Is that not a sign that diplomacy still works?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON

Mr. Chair, I am very proud of the position our country has adopted. As the member can imagine, we have consulted very closely with our European allies, and I would say that our position is very consistent with theirs so far. We have said that we understand the concerns about Iran's nuclear facilities. We also are very much concerned about Iranians and the terrible things they have experienced at the hands of their own regime. Our position is very consistent with the position that has been adopted by our closest allies.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Eglinton—Lawrence Ontario

Liberal

Vince Gasparro LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Secretary of State (Combatting Crime)

Mr. Chair, there is a great deal of complexity around deporting people from this country, and it spans across governments. What I am referring to specifically in this case is a former central banker of Iran, Mahmmoud Reza Khavari, who came to this country when Stephen Harper and the Conservative government were in power.

Can you speak to how difficult it is to deport people and how it spans across political parties?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Assistant Deputy Chair Conservative John Nater

Questions should be directed through the Chair.

The hon. parliamentary secretary.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

March 9th, 2026 / 9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON

Mr. Chair, I thank my good friend and colleague for his understanding and appreciation of the complexities of these cases.

Yes, this was a central banker of the Iranian regime who arrived here in Canada. The Conservative government did zero. So, I find it rich when I am hearing all these lectures about how terrible our government is. The reality is that these are sophisticated, complex files, and I think we can all work together to do a much better job.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Chair, I wonder if the hon. parliamentary secretary can agree with me that there are times when we land on the same place, like with the need to get rid of former Iranian Guard members who make Iranian Canadians and others in the diaspora feel afraid. We have to deal with that, but can we also agree that a lot of Iranian dissidents who hate this regime also object to the bombing by the United States and Israel?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Ali Ehsassi Liberal Willowdale, ON

Mr. Chair, again, it is very important to highlight that we have been very vigilant about members of the Iranian regime. We are the only country that has on our books a law that says that any individual who has served the Iranian regime since 2004 has no right to be admitted into Canada. I do not know of any other country that has such a law.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

9:55 p.m.

Conservative

Sandra Cobena Conservative Newmarket—Aurora, ON

Mr. Chair, I will be splitting my time with the member for Richmond Hill South.

This past weekend, I held an open house in my riding of Newmarket—Aurora. It was a chance for neighbours to come by, share a cup of coffee and talk about issues affecting their families and what is happening around the world. Among those who came were many members of the Persian diaspora, my neighbours, people who have called our community home for years. They are entrepreneurs, parents, students and neighbours. They contribute so much to the life of our community.

However, this weekend they came with cautious optimism and heavy hearts. They spoke about the war unfolding in Iran and the uncertainty, the fear and the anguish of watching events unfold from thousands of kilometres away while their families and friends remain there.

I said to them that many of us see the headlines, the stories of bombings, sunken ships, schools, and soldiers dying. I asked how they see this moment and what it means for them and their families. Their answer struck me. They said they have lived under this oppression for 47 years and know that this will be their last chance in a generation.

With tears in their eyes, they talked of the cautious optimism of what this means to them. They spoke about the many protests over the years. They spoke about the young people who marched for freedom. They spoke about the women who stood up to demand dignity and opportunity. Many of those protesters paid with their life.

Just a month ago, more lives were lost as people once again took to the streets in hope of a different future. They told me something that was both heartbreaking and powerful. They said that, yes, it is painful to hear of the bombings near their families, but they believe this may be their only chance to break free from a regime that has oppressed their people, their families and especially their women for generations.

That perspective struck me because here in Canada we often discuss these issues in terms of diplomacy, international law and geopolitics. Yes, those discussions are important, but for many people in my community, this is personal. It is about their parents, brothers, sisters, cousins and childhood neighbourhoods. It is about their language, their culture and their history. They carry the unfathomable weight of all of that while watching events unfold from afar.

Today, I simply want to be a voice for those members of our community, a voice that says we know this moment is painful. We know that they are worried for their families. We know that they carry both hope and fear at the same time. Canada cannot control the actions of other nations or the course of events far beyond our borders, but we can be a voice that says we believe that every person is born with inherent rights to life, to liberty and to safety.

The method of the Iranian regime is not constrained by borders. It operates in our home as well. To this day, an estimated 700 IRGC operatives are operating here in Canada, intimidating Canadians on Canadian soil, and this is unacceptable. Our thoughts are with Iranians here in Canada, and our prayers are with their families.

We hope sincerely and deeply that out of this moment, something better will emerge: a future where the people of Iran can live with freedom, where women can live with dignity and where a proud civilization, one that has contributed so much to human history, can flourish once again under the values of liberty and opportunity. This wish is one shared by many people in my riding and many other Canadians, and today I want to give it a voice.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Chair, I thank my colleague for her speech, in which she spoke in particular about these courageous Iranian women and their “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement. She expressed her hope that, in the future, these women will have a state that respects their rights.

Does my colleague really believe that, by leaving the choice of Iran's next leader to the U.S. president at this time, she can truly guarantee that these Iranian women will be able to live safely and that their rights will be respected?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10 p.m.

Conservative

Sandra Cobena Conservative Newmarket—Aurora, ON

Mr. Chair, the future of Iran and the future Iranian government is up to the Iranian people. I think the Iranian diaspora here has been very clear in their cautious optimism for what this opportunity has created. There have been family members who have died with the hope of an opportunity to have a new government, a new life. That moment has come, and they are cautiously excited about it, but it would be up to the Iranian people to democratically elect their new government.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Chair, I know my colleague is very close to the Iranian-Canadian community in her riding. She knows that this is a community with thousands of years of history. It is a history of religious tolerance and of good relations with other faith communities, including the Jewish and Christian communities, as well as a history of intellectual inquiry, creativity, art, beauty and so much more.

The hope of this present moment is that space and security can be created for the people of Iran to control their own future, drawing from this rich past. We see that incredible potential in the heroic courage of the Iranian people who are ready to give their lives to restore their country.

For the member, I want to ask what her hopes are. What is she hearing from her constituents about what they believe is possible for a future free Iran?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10 p.m.

Conservative

Sandra Cobena Conservative Newmarket—Aurora, ON

Mr. Chair, the stories I have heard over the last few months are countless. There are stories of hope and heartache. There is a deep desire for life and liberty, and for economic stability. There are stories, also, about the history of Iran and what Iranians have contributed for over two millennia. It is their desire, their dream, to continue the work in leading their contributions in governance, culture, science, literature and trade. It is their wish that they can live in a country that has safety, liberty, freedom and that they can lead in all these academic areas as well.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Chair, following up on my question, the member spoke about the sense that this is a final battle. I know I have heard similar language being used by the community in my region of Edmonton. There are members across the way who say that they do not like the regime but that we should still advocate for countries to sit on the sidelines and wait for things to unfold. I know that the communities in Canada have been asking for this intervention because they know that success at this juncture is critical.

The member spoke, as well, about this being a final battle in the pursuit of freedom. I wonder if she could share why it is so important to not sit on the sidelines but to engage, act and support the people of Iran right now.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10 p.m.

Conservative

Sandra Cobena Conservative Newmarket—Aurora, ON

Mr. Chair, the people of Iran have been very clear. They have been waiting for 47 years. The reality is that many lives have been lost. Iranian people today want to know that those lives, those sacrifices, were worth it. Right now, they believe that it is their only chance.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:05 p.m.

Conservative

Vincent Ho Conservative Richmond Hill South, ON

Mr. Chair, the Liberal Prime Minister claimed that he is the man we want in a crisis, but recent days have shown that he cannot live up to his own standard.

Over the last week, Canadians have not seen leadership. They have seen contradictions, confusion and a series of foreign policy flip-flops on Iran and the conflict in the Middle East. First, the Liberal Prime Minister came out clearly in support of the American and Israeli strikes on Iran. His statement was unequivocal. He said, “Canada supports the United States acting to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and to prevent its regime from further threatening international peace and security.” However, only days later, he said he made the statement “with regret”, called the strikes a breakdown of the international order and said they are a violation of international law. Then he started calling for a de-escalation and a ceasefire that would, if we carefully read between the lines, leave the same brutal regime in place.

Let us not forget that this is the same regime that terrorizes its own people and, more recently, killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians and injured many more in a short few months. This is also the same regime that has sponsored terrorism across the Middle East and all across the world for the last 47 years and whose agents and proxies intimidate communities here in Canada.

While he calls for de-escalation, the Liberal Prime Minister simultaneously says he is not ruling out military participation with the United States. Canadians deserve clarity, but instead, they are getting contradictions. On the conflict in the Middle East, the Liberal Prime Minister says one thing to one audience and something different to the next. He tells Canadians that he represents a so-called new government, but the more Canadians watch these flip-flopping statements, the more it looks exactly like the old Liberal playbook: confusion, contradictions and someone who is not to be taken seriously. First, he supports decisive action. Then he regrets supporting it. Then he calls the situation a breakdown of the international order and says that international law binds all parties involved, but at the same time, he refuses to rule out sending Canadian troops into the conflict.

If the Liberal Prime Minister believes this is a breakdown of the international order, Canadians deserve to know what exactly Canada's position is. Is the Liberal government supporting decisive action against a dangerous regime, or is it calling for a ceasefire that leaves that regime untouched?

Even members of his own cabinet cannot keep the story straight. The Liberal foreign affairs minister said last week that Canada prefers “a diplomatic resolution”, an end to the U.S. strikes, and believes in a peaceful resolution. At the same time, the Liberal defence minister tried to say both contradictory things at once. He said the Liberal government supports the U.S. strikes but also supports a ceasefire. That is not clarity or leadership. It is trying to be on both sides of the same conflict at the same time by speaking out of both sides of his Liberal mouth.

Meanwhile, the Liberal Prime Minister has been avoiding the media and refusing to answer questions about the safety and security of Canadians overseas and here at home, about Canada's role in the international response or about whether Canada could be drawn into a military conflict. By the way, Conservatives are calling for a debate and vote before Canada gets involved militarily.

The silence is deeply troubling. As head of government, the Prime Minister has a special responsibility for national security and the conduct of Canada's international relations for Canada's national interests. Canadians deserve transparency, consistency and clear leadership.

The regime in Iran has shown time and time again that it cannot be trusted. It lies, represses its own people, sponsors terror across the region and repeatedly demonstrates that it is incapable of negotiating in good faith and engaging in diplomacy. This is why Canadians, especially many in my riding of Richmond Hill South and many other communities across this country, understand what is at stake. They understand the brutality of the regime and the courage of the Iranian people who are fighting for freedom and making the ultimate sacrifice. They understand that moral clarity matters, but instead of moral clarity, the Liberal government offers mixed messages. Instead of firm leadership, it offers hesitation. Instead of answering questions, the Liberal Prime Minister simply disappears.

Only Conservatives are prepared to speak clearly. We stand with the people of Iran who seek freedom from tyranny and a peaceful transition to a free and democratic Iran. We support decisive action to prevent the regime from acquiring nuclear weapons, and we will always stand for the protection of Canadians here at home, especially against the threats posed by foreign terror networks and their proxies.

Canadians deserve a government that is clear in its principles, firm in its decisions and accountable for its actions. Right now, they are getting none of these things from the Liberal Prime Minister. He must stop hiding. He must come before Canadians and answer the very simple question that still remains: What exactly is Canada's position?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Chair, I want to thank my colleague for his excellent speech. He has been here for about a year and he has already made a real mark on this institution in so many different ways. I want to ask him about the issue of foreign interference because I know he has a large Iranian community in his riding. I am sure there are concerns about how the regime seeks to project power beyond its borders, even here in Canada, intimidating people who are trying to speak out.

What is he hearing from people in his riding about how foreign interference impacts them here in Canada and what needs to be done in response?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Conservative

Vincent Ho Conservative Richmond Hill South, ON

Mr. Chair, people are infuriated. They are infuriated after years of Conservatives and advocates calling for the implementation of a foreign agent registry, which is still delayed. After two years, it still has not been implemented. The Liberals are mulling $50 fines. Members know that $50 is not even enough to get groceries for a family in this Liberal economy. People are frustrated that the Liberals are not taking serious action to combat foreign interference. There are hundreds and hundreds of regime agents who are terrorizing communities. They are intimidating journalists. They are silencing activists. They are terrorizing business owners. That has to stop.

It is time for the Liberals to stop delivering empty Liberal rhetoric and it is time for them to start taking action.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

Mr. Chair, I am going to ask a very simple question.

Today I am hearing the Conservatives say that there is an urgent need to overthrow this regime. How is it that, prior to this American and Israeli attack, I had never heard them calling for such intervention?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Conservative

Vincent Ho Conservative Richmond Hill South, ON

Mr. Chair, Conservatives have always been consistent in our view. We ae unequivocal in our support of the Iranian people who are braving bullets, blackouts and beatings, executions and torture, because they seek a new and free Iran. Conservatives will always stand with the Iranian people against this tyrannical regime.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Chair, it is important to correct the record in terms of what my Bloc colleague said. He can review the Hansard for at least my statements, going back to three parliaments ago. I was very clear about wanting to see and expressing hope for an end to the Iranian regime, expressing hope that the various protest movements that we have seen over the years would succeed in toppling the regime, giving the Iranian people a government that is responsive, democratic, free and pluralistic; indeed, giving them the government that they deserve.

What has been clear over the years is that these protest movements have been met with escalating brutality. At that point, the only alternatives were intervention or the complete subjugation of the people in a military dictatorship, persistent—

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Assistant Deputy Chair Conservative John Nater

I have to give time to the hon. member to respond.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

Mr. Chair, I rise on a point of order.

I simply want to explain to my colleague that there is a difference between hoping for regime change and hoping that the protesters succeed, and wishing for a military attack.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Assistant Deputy Chair Conservative John Nater

That is debate.

The hon. member for Richmond Hill South.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

10:10 p.m.

Conservative

Vincent Ho Conservative Richmond Hill South, ON

Mr. Chair, Canadians have been wondering this past week about the Liberal Prime Minister's flip-flop. First, he unequivocally supported the strikes from Israel and U.S. on Iran and the Iranian regime. Then he called for de-escalation and ceasefires. Then, all of a sudden, he said it is a breakdown of an international order and a violation of international law. Then he went on and said that maybe we should not rule out military participation.

Canadians and people in my riding of Richmond Hill South are wondering when the Liberal government will offer the moral clarity that they deserve rather than giving flip-flopping Liberal statements that sound a whole lot like the last Liberal prime minister.