Excuse me, Mr. Brind'Amour.
You're a witness under subpoena and under oath. I know there isn't a judge in front of you, but this is shocking. Again, it speaks to how Hockey Canada and its leadership view these proceedings and how it has taken part in past actions. It's truly troubling that you would dismiss them and dismiss us. We have the same powers as a court. We've brought you here under summons, and this is truly disappointing.
Ms. Skinner, in your opening statement, I was particularly shocked when you thought Hockey Canada was being scapegoated in these proceedings. It seems to dismiss some of the responsibility you have as a board, especially when you bring in suggestions of.... You said a politician was recently found to have engaged in sexual assault. That is true, but I believe that member was kicked out of the Conservative caucus. There were consequences for that. Mr. Nater is nodding in agreement. The Senate moved to have that member expelled from the Senate, and now there are charges laid against him.
Why are you using that as an example? There were consequences for this politician, whereas the players and leaders involved in what happened at Hockey Canada seem to have faced no consequences.
Can you help me square the circle in terms of...?