Yes, that's fine.
In terms of the specifics of the Birarda case back in 2008, the executive committee, which is a committee of eight people from the board, considered the allegation against Mr. Birarda as it related to inappropriate texting. The matter was investigated by an independent ombudswoman and legal counsel.
There were two conference calls that dealt with this matter. One was to suspend Mr. Birarda. The second was to hire an investigator.
The second conference call, weeks later, dealt with the recommendation by the investigator, through our president, to confirm that there would be no police undertaking in this matter, unfortunately. To your point, there was also the texting that was confirmed to be inappropriate for a coach-player relationship. Also, the identity of the players or player involved, as well as the details of the texting, were not revealed to the committee because of privacy and confidentiality issues.
With respect to the specifics of coaching, up until recently and going back to 2008, the only risk management tool that a club had was a police background check. If you passed the police background check, you could coach in Canada. Unfortunately, that is not a system that is tenable, to your point.
I think that recently there have been changes. I think Canada Soccer can speak to that. Some of those changes were started, in effect, in 2012 under the guidelines of Sport Canada. These are some of the things that I think the whole industry of player welfare and safe sport need to change, so that you can't just rely on a police background check. If the police do not interact with them or do what needs to be done, obviously this person—