Evidence of meeting #127 for Environment and Sustainable Development in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was parks.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
We're not summonsing anybody with a motion that says “invite”. It doesn't say.... What we're doing here is after “Catherine McKenna”. The wording is the same as that in the original motion. It's just that we're adding names.
Oh, there is the word “summon”. Okay.
Mr. van Koeverden, maybe you want to change “summon” to “invite”.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
Okay.
That's the amendment. We're going to write it down and distribute it to everybody by email. It's not that complicated. We're changing “summon” to “invite”, and we're adding Leona Aglukkaq, Peter Kent and his then policy adviser, Melissa Lantsman.
Go ahead on your point of order, yes.
Conservative
Dane Lloyd Conservative Sturgeon River—Parkland, AB
I believe there was already an invitation sent out to former minister McKenna, which was declined. The reason for the summons is to compel former minister McKenna to come. It would be appropriate, I think, to maintain the word “summon”. I know this is debate, but the invitation—
Liberal
Liberal
Leah Taylor Roy Liberal Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON
Can I put forward a motion to adjourn? We're over time. This is committee business and people have to go.
Liberal
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal Francis Scarpaleggia
We have a motion to adjourn. If that is defeated, you can have a motion to suspend—though I don't think there's much of a difference, in this case.
We have a motion to adjourn. We're going to vote. Then we'll take it from there, depending on the result of the vote.
(Motion agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4)
