I'll start talking a little bit. We'll kick it off and hopefully not offend anyone. Certainly, certain countries outside of Canada have been more bullish on policies, where certain fuels in certain applications are no longer accepted. Those economic environments are quite different from Canada's economic environment, in which we do rely on that sector to fund a lot of non-energy-related programs around social services and other pieces.
At Foresight, we are supporting those regions that would like to go aggressively and go straight to green hydrogen, but we also understand that some sectors need to take a more thoughtful approach.
Something I would like to see, and something that Foresight has been championing, is an energy decision tree so we can map out where it makes sense for hydro, biofuels or hydrogen, based on some economic drivers in different regions or some outputs or waste energy materials—biofuels and things like that—in certain heavy-industry regions across the country. That might accelerate that pathway for industry that is perhaps not able to flip a switch.
In certain situations where there's more low-hanging fruit, I think we could be more bullish. Retrofits and stuff are nice, but, even with cement, there are still a lot of great companies that are doing zero cement that can't get into the sector. Energy is a big piece, but I'm cognizant of the importance of that sector for other intentions.