That's exactly the question we're trying to get at. I appreciate your asking that.
Monsieur Mayrand stated that the transfer of funds from a national party to a campaign and from a campaign back is perfectly legal. What happened to you, sir, is perfectly legal according to Elections Canada. But if I could read you something--I did this this morning--I want to ask you if this is similar to what happened to you.
A lady named Lucy, the bookkeeper for the New Democratic Party of Canada, wrote in an e-mail to an official agent of Libby Davies in British Columbia:
Please find attached an invoice from the federal party. The original will follow by mail. It is our understanding that these radio ads promoted your candidate during the election period. Please forward payment to the election party, the federal party, as soon as possible. The amount should be reported as a candidate expense at the local campaign.
Now, Phyllis, the financial officer for Libby Davies, wrote back on March 30 and said:
This is not our invoice. Mindful about the extended campaign and limited budget, we were only able to take out a few ethnic ads, all coordinated through Stanley Tsao, the NDP B.C. Chinese media. A cheque of $1,500 for our portion was forwarded to the Canadian NDP party in cash. Please check, because this really, really is bad for our ceiling.
The very next day the bookkeeper for the national NDP party wrote back and said:
Hi, Phyllis, we are told by communication folks in B.C. that these were radio ads with the candidate's personal tag at the end, therefore, a local expense to be reported under the candidate's expense ceiling regardless of who pays. For rebate purposes you are being billed $2,612. The good news is that the federal party will transfer in $2,600 to the riding association's account. We hope you are able to squeeze this under the ceiling. Some expenses are considered election expenses and are not subject to spending limits and we....
Mr. Mayrand has said that transfers of funds in and out are legal. That is what happened to you, sir. The transfer of expenses is not. He admitted that's a difficulty of interpretation before the courts.
Does that sound similar to what happened to you? If it does, sir, why do you think that Elections Canada is not investigating the NDP?