Okay, I appreciate that.
We've heard from the testimony, going back to Nigel Wright, that the whole point of it is that you don't know what's in there. We've heard from witnesses in this committee, like the professor from York University, who said that there was a public office holder who later found out, post holding office, that there were investment decisions that they didn't agree with and they were disappointed, but they didn't know. That's the whole point.
The other point of this is that it seems the process is blind on two sides, in a sense, because the Prime Minister himself also does not administer the ethics screen you've been describing for us. In fact, that screen is administered by you and the Clerk of the Privy Council and overseen by the Ethics Commissioner.
Is that right?