Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Welcome to our guests. I appreciate your testimony. It's great to be here today in Mr. MacAulay's riding. You certainly draw a crowd, Lawrence. It's great to see everybody. Small rural communities, that's what this is all about.
I have just a couple of things. I am glad Mr. MacAulay brought up the WTO, because based on discussions I've had, this Doha Round has been going on since 2001, so there's a reason we're in 2009 and we still haven't got agreement. It's for a lot of those reasons we talked about: the importance of our small craft harbours program, as well as the importance of the EI system too, clear across the country. I think what we're going to see is that...certainly I don't believe any different from our minister, who would not be supporting any type of agreement where those things would be in jeopardy. So I think we can put our minds at ease a little bit on some of that.
I have a question on the conservation and protection, Bobby, that you were bringing up. The FRCC report of 2007, in section 7.2, talks a lot about some of the self-policing and some of the issues around management of the stock. When we were on the Magdalen Islands, we had a discussion about this. Some of the testimony we heard is that there is a role for government to play in this, but they also said the fishers are cooperating, that there are efforts to combat poaching—they have 1-800 numbers, and they're actually going into the schools to teach their young kids about the importance of the industry and the mechanisms.
One of the lines in the report said it was suggested to the FRCC that some harvesters set as many as 50% more traps than the allowed limit. So in addition to your suggestions about reserve fisheries officers and that type of thing, in line with the comprehensive approach, what kinds of other things would you suggest the industry could play a part in, if government and industry came together to help police this? What types of things would you suggest you could do?