Thank you, Chair.
My question will go to Ms. Giffin. It's based on the testimony given by Mr. Woodley, who I would like to thank for giving an unbiased, candid perspective on marine protected areas.
This committee's primary responsibility and role is to advise on policy that'll protect the resource fisheries for, obviously, the benefit of those coastal community fishers who participate in that. We know the data show the natural species in worldwide oceans are declining, and nobody disputes that. One of the key areas, much as we sometimes dislike it, is that overharvesting is the biggest reason for stock decline, which you stated. Good oceans benefit nature and people.
Ms. Giffin, why does even the discussion around marine protected areas—because there is a value—get such a negative reaction from fishers? What is the real cause? Is it the way the department approaches it?