Evidence of meeting #54 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was document.
A recording is available from Parliament.
12:10 p.m.
An hon. member
Then put it in the report.
12:10 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
12:15 p.m.
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON
But we didn't put in the report that it--
12:15 p.m.
An hon. member
Filibuster.
12:15 p.m.
Conservative
12:15 p.m.
An hon. member
You started the first point of order.
12:15 p.m.
Conservative
12:15 p.m.
Conservative
12:15 p.m.
Liberal
12:15 p.m.
NDP
Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB
Even if the sun does rise and set every night, I am prepared to vote on this, Mr. Chairman.
12:15 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
Thank you.
On the amendment to paragraph 4 that Mr. Reid has suggested, all those in favour?
12:15 p.m.
An hon. member
We'd like a recorded vote, Mr. Chair.
12:15 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
Thank you.
(Amendment negatived: nays 6; yeas 5)
So we're still on page one and paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the report.
Mr. Proulx.
12:15 p.m.
Liberal
Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC
On paragraph 4, Mr. Chair, in the French version, the first sentence, the first line, we're referring to the word “non”, meaning “no”.
I think we should have some sort of an explanation or some sort of a note to say that in the document the word was not “non” but “not”.
12:15 p.m.
Conservative
12:15 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
12:15 p.m.
Nicolas Auclair Committee Researcher
Mr. Proulx, we could add in brackets that the “non”—or “not” in this case—was only written in English.
12:15 p.m.
Bloc
Pierre Paquette Bloc Joliette, QC
Yes, because otherwise, the sentence in French doesn't make sense.
