Evidence of meeting #54 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 40th Parliament, 3rd session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was document.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON
Yes, I think the same problem exists in English. It wasn't a supplementary report, it was a dissenting report.
I'm not sure if Mr. Lukiwski probably had the same thing I was going to talk about.
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
My point is that we have to amend this because the report states that the dissenting report—this is called a “supplementary” report—is “prepared by the Conservative Party of Canada”. It was not. It was prepared by the government members on the committee, not the Conservative Party of Canada.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
The report states it as “a supplementary report prepared by the Conservative Party of Canada”, attached to the report.
So I know where they got the words. It may not be correct, but that's where the words came from.
Conservative
Conservative
Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON
I know, but that's what it says, so I'm not worried about it.
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
It would be the government members sitting on the committee who prepared the report, would it not?
Conservative
Conservative
Conservative
Conservative
Harold Albrecht Conservative Kitchener—Conestoga, ON
There's the question about “supplementary” or “dissenting”.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
It says “supplementary”, so we're going to sit there, I think.
All in favour of paragraph 11, as changed?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Joe Preston
(Paragraphs 12 to 15 inclusive agreed to)
All in favour of paragraph 16?
Conservative
