I'm willing to make that amendment, but I'm still trying to understand this.
Procedurally, if we vote on the main motion and it passes, because there are no specific timelines directed from that, if I remember from what was emailed to everybody.... There is a timeline. It's no later than February 4 for those ministers to appear.
My assumption is that we'll get exactly what Madame Chabot wants and we'll get what Mr. Long wants. We'll get the officials appearing here on Monday, and then we'll get the ministers appearing no later than the fourth. Both could work here; we can get the amendment that's already passed and we can still get the original motion adopted.
If that isn't the case and I've misunderstood that, I am willing to move the new amendment to the amendment or the amendment to the main motion, whatever it is, to make this happen to go forward. I guess it's not a subamendment to the amendment, because it's already been voted on; it would be an amendment to the main motion. I think the main motion is still in order and it doesn't take away from the amendment that was made.