Those barriers would be getting the right information up front, knowing what they're actually getting into and being pointed toward accurate, good resources.
In my presentation, I mentioned pre-entry programs. Some of these things can be great programs, but when they're placed as a kind of cost of entry into apprenticeship, they get used almost as adult day care centres, for lack of a better term. They put people through because they don't have anything else to do. The people who start are kind of experimenting and they don't see their way through the apprenticeship.
The other thing I would mention is the wraparound supports. We have the highest completion rates in our industry for the pipe trades, exceeding 90% completion for anybody who starts an apprenticeship with us. That is by no mistake. The average rate of completion outside of our walls, which includes us actually, is in the 50th percentile. Including our numbers, that's very dismal. It speaks to the value of the wraparound supports that we have created and to the fact that we keep our promises.
Every person who enters our programs through a pre-entry program, as long as they make it to the end of the training—and it's no harm if they don't; maybe they figured out along the way that it's not for them—becomes a registered apprentice immediately, if not at the start of our programs. We have, again, an over 95% success rate of registration of apprentices for pre-entry. We have to keep our promises at every level.
I would be remiss not to mention the funding disparity at the jurisdictional level for attending a trade school. We have a backlog of people trying to attend trade schools in a timely fashion. We have public colleges that cancel classes on apprentices. When they take time off work and go on EI to be able to tell their employer that they'll look to return after they attend basic, intermediate, advanced, or whatever level of training they're in, and when the school shuts things down because it doesn't have the adequate numbers to be profitable or to cover its expenses, that's detrimental to the system. It's an irresponsibility. We have never done that in the UA. In fact, we offer to deliver that training for free.