Evidence of meeting #84 for Citizenship and Immigration in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Michelle Rempel  Calgary Centre-North, CPC

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

I have a point of order.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Thank you, Madame Groguhé.

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

I can talk about the bill, after all.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

We have a point of order.

Mr. Dykstra.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

Mr. Chairman, I have Ms. Groguhé's speech from last week, the nine hours she spent delivering it. I can read and quote almost verbatim the same things she's repeating now. I am completely—

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

No, absolutely not.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

Yes, I have them right here. These are things you talked about.

I would appreciate, if she has something new to bring to the table or something different to bring to the table, hearing it. But a nine-hour speech covering off almost...well, a to z, soup to nuts, call it whatever you want, I'm not going to listen to again. And I will continue to interject with points of order. All of these comments that she's made are, for the record, in Hansard. They have been made already.

I'll start reading them instead of having to listen to her say them again.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

We'll have Mr. Menegakis, and then Ms. Sitsabaiesan.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Costas Menegakis Conservative Richmond Hill, ON

I'd like to speak on that point of order, Mr. Chair.

It's a huge disrespect to me and other parliamentarians here around the table for someone who spoke for the better part of eight hours plus at this committee to now come back and repeat the stuff we heard for eight hours continuously just last week. It's the same process, the same meeting right now, which the opposition has been filibustering since last Tuesday morning at 8:45. To bring those remarks back in now, as if there were something new to offer that could not have been said in eight hours, quite frankly, I think it might be insulting even to the member herself, who feels she now has discovered something that in eight hours in a row in the previous week she couldn't communicate.

Certainly, there's nothing new there. We've heard all of this stuff before.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

I have—

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

No, you'll have to wait. I have a speaking order, and you are on the list.

Ms. Sitsabaiesan.

Rathika Sitsabaiesan NDP Scarborough—Rouge River, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I don't find that Madame Groguhé is repeating herself verbatim.

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

I did not repeat the same thing.

Rathika Sitsabaiesan NDP Scarborough—Rouge River, ON

Looking at what she has in front of her....

Should I wait for the room to achieve some order? Sorry I don't understand; I don't think his mike was on; I couldn't hear what he was saying.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Dykstra Conservative St. Catharines, ON

I guess it's pretty much mutual.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Continue, Ms. Sitsabaiesan.

Rathika Sitsabaiesan NDP Scarborough—Rouge River, ON

Thank you.

Looking at Ms. Groguhé when she was speaking, I remember when she was speaking for a very long time, because she had a lot to say. She had pre-written typed-up notes, and she was reading our her pre-written notes. Mr. Dykstra is accusing her of repeating what she had repeated last week verbatim, and if so, I would like him to actually read and see if it is actually verbatim. I don't believe what she is saying here today is verbatim.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Ms. Sitsabaiesan, my problem—and this is directed to you, Madame Groguhé—is that I wasn't present last week. Quite frankly, I don't want to hear Mr. Dykstra go on and read pages and pages. I don't want to hear nine hours of debate. I don't want to do that.

Madame Groguhé is next, then Mr. Dykstra and Ms. Sims.

Have you finished, Ms. Sitsabaiesan?

Rathika Sitsabaiesan NDP Scarborough—Rouge River, ON

I have now.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Madam Groguhé, you are next on the list.

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

Yes, Mr. Chair.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

I would like you to tell the committee to endeavour not to repeat what you said last week, because I really don't want Mr. Dykstra to read pages and pages of what you said.

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

Forgive me, Mr. Chair, but that is nonsense. This is clearly an all-out attack on what I just said, which has no connection to what I said in your absence. I don't know who is being disrespectful to members of the committee, but it certainly isn't me.

Up to this point, I have always been open-minded enough to listen to what others have to say, to let them speak and to have their floor time. I don't like being scolded and criticized in that manner by my government colleagues. I think that's an important point.

Mr. Chair, when you scolded me regarding the 30-day extension, I wasn't making any reference whatsoever to the document or what I may have said previously. I don't even have the document here, for that matter. All I was doing was clearly explaining my decision not to support this motion.

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative David Tilson

Madame Groguhé, my position would be that you don't have to repeat it word for word, that even if you get into the generalities, that's repetition.

Sadia Groguhé NDP Saint-Lambert, QC

No.