Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Good afternoon to each of you. It's good to be with you.
It sounds like a conversation that should have happened a long time ago, before the program was announced, in my view. So many issues have arisen in this committee room this afternoon that obviously the program has not taken into account.
For instance, the eligibility list that just came out in October.... Most of the sealifts have come and gone by October. You have a regime coming in that doesn't take into account the nuances in certain parts of the north. In Labrador, we have a number of communities on the list; some are going to be dropped and they weren't notified and weren't involved in it. They're facing the same circumstance. People are going to the grocery store, going to the retailer, and asking why is this now so pricey compared to what it's been in the past.
The aim of the program—nutritious foods for healthier people and healthier communities—is a noble goal. It was one of the goals of the food mail program. Under the food mail program, you could have tweaked the eligibility list to put more focus on nutritious foods or perishable items. There's a question whether a wholesale reform was necessary.
To me, it would have had to do with the structure of the program and how the program was implemented. Maybe a wholesale structural change was not what was necessary. It will be nice when we get the officials in front of us to hear what they have to say, whether there was some kind of comparative study done between what was happening with the food mail program, what's going to happen now, and why this one is apparently going to be a great successor.
On country foods, I'd just like to correct the parliamentary secretary. Not all country foods that are going to be transferred from community to community are going to be subsidized. It's only if you have an abattoir—somebody that's producing and manufacturing these country foods for retail sale. That's what's going to be subsidized under the program, not in the case of Ms. Simon, whose family and relatives are moving and transporting foods because of the lack of caribou in other areas.
The whole issue of the advisory committee being the voice of northerners—there are many voices in the north, I would think. Not all the areas are going to be represented on this advisory committee. We've got to have an avenue where all the voices of the people in the north can be given some hearing and can certainly be taken into account.
Do you believe that maybe a delay in the full implementation of this program would be something we could recommend to the minister until a lot of these nuances—through more collaborative effort, more consultation—are resolved?
Would you give us another six months or something to work out some of these things? Five months, and it's gone. Would a delay in the implementation of the program work, while keeping the $60 million in stable funding there?