[Witness spoke in Algonquin Anishinabemowin and provided the following text:]
Kwey kakina, lisa nindizhinikaaz, maang dodem, mahingan sagahigan nindoonjibaa.
[Witness provided the following translation:]
Hi, everyone. Lisa is my name. I am Loon Clan. I am from Wolf Lake.
[English]
I, too, would like to welcome you to unceded, unsurrendered Algonquin territory.
Thank you, Chair and members of the committee, for giving me the opportunity to speak today.
I am here today to present on behalf of Wolf Lake First Nation, a historic Algonquin nation that has been recognized by the federal government for generations, yet remains without a reserve.
This is not a new issue. Algonquin chiefs have petitioned the Crown for land for more than 200 years. Canada has been on notice for two centuries. What has changed is not the legitimacy of our request but how long Canada expects us to wait. This situation is not a result of legal uncertainty; it is the result of administrative choice.
Wolf Lake is described as landless, but that term is misleading. We are not landless. We have always had our territory, the territory that our people have occupied, governed and cared for since long before Confederation. We are reserveless because Canada has failed to fulfill its obligation to set aside reserve lands. That failure has real consequences. Without a reserve, our members are excluded from infrastructure, housing and essential services. Services without land is not a remedy. They leave communities like ours in perpetual insecurity, and the cost of that failure is paid every day by our people.
We have done everything that Canada has asked of us. We submitted claims in the 1980s, the 1990s, the early 2000s and, more recently, a specific claim in 2018. Negotiations began in 2020. Canada created timelines and systems intended to deliver resolution, yet years and even decades later, we remain without a land base.
When the systems that Canada relies on, whether negotiations or tribunal processes, extend over many years without tangible results, the process itself becomes a substitute for justice. Delaying justice is not neutral. It actively harms the people of Wolf Lake, and that harm is now irreversible. Because we were denied a land base, our nation has been dispersed across jurisdictions. This dispersal was not voluntary. It was the consequence of policy failure.
The current generation of elders is the last with lived memory of Wolf Lake together as a community gathered on our land. As they pass, that irreplaceable knowledge, continuity and living history are lost. No future settlement can restore what is being lost through delay. At this stage, time itself has become the harm.
This dispossession has also created real division within our community. Families have been forced to live apart and to organize separately, and that division is not a failure of our people, it is the result of being denied the land that makes unity possible.
Canada knew who we were, where we were and how to act and, in other cases, it did act. We remain caught in a jurisdictional loop where responsibility shifts and nothing moves, an impasse only federal leadership can break.
This committee has already recognized these failures. In its 2024 report on reclaiming the land, INAN called for concrete measures to restore land to first nations and for clear pathways to resolve historical obligations. Wolf Lake First Nation is a test as to whether those recommendations will be implemented.
I also want to note a growing contradiction. The government has shown that it can move quickly when it wants to or chooses to, yet when it comes to reconciliation and providing a land base to a historic first nation, we are told the system cannot move.
I will conclude by saying that we are not asking for anything our past chiefs have not already asked for. We are asking that our elders, while they are still with us, have the opportunity to be together as a community on our land. Canada knew who we were, where we were and how to act. The absence of a reserve for Wolf Lake First Nation is not an accident. It is a choice that can and must be corrected.
The question before this committee is no longer whether the problem exists, but when Canada is prepared to act. Our nation is ready.
Meegwetch.