Mr. Chairman, I think there is a problem. Let's not fool ourselves. It is impossible for a bilingual instructor to provide a course to two groups of individuals speaking two different languages. I do not think that it is possible. That is why in Canada, we have francophone colleges and universities on the one hand, and anglophone colleges and universities on the other.
I think that is where the problem lies, whether it be in Borden, Gagetown, or the Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland. How can these individuals provide a course in French when they are all anglophones? If we want francophones to be trained in their own language, then we are going to have to add a francophone institution. That is the problem. We do not need to look elsewhere.
I have trouble accepting what Mr. Lemieux stated, that is that the problem is due to the fact that they are having trouble finding instructors who speak French. There are more than 9 million francophones in Canada, so do not try to make me believe that it is impossible to find a few instructors. I am not even going to say out loud what I am thinking. This makes no sense.
In the same vein, I would say that in this case National Defence does not respect both official languages of this country. I do not think this is a problem of money, but if it is, then these people should tell the government that they cannot cover the cost of two institutions.
It is all very well to say that the instructor speaks French and English, but how can he use a book and provide explanations to everyone at the same time in both languages? That is not done anywhere else. You stated clearly that at Saint-Jean, the courses that are offered are not the same as those in Borden. It is not surprising that the problem exists: in order to respect both official languages, this training has to be provided in two different institutions.
Would you agree with me?