Evidence of meeting #96 for Official Languages in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was newspaper.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Sharon McCully  Publisher, The Sherbrooke Record
George Guzmas  Co-Publisher, The North Shore News, Newsfirst Multimedia
Lily Ryan  Publisher and Managing Editor, Aylmer Bulletin

March 26th, 2018 / 4:20 p.m.

Liberal

René Arseneault Liberal Madawaska—Restigouche, NB

Mr. Chair, in order to save time, I move that we adjourn the debate.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Are you ready to vote to adjourn the debate?

4:20 p.m.

NDP

François Choquette NDP Drummond, QC

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

We are listening, Mr. Choquette.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

François Choquette NDP Drummond, QC

If we put an end to the debate, will that also adjourn the meeting?

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

The purpose of the motion is to adjourn the debate.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

François Choquette NDP Drummond, QC

So we can adjourn any debate in this way because it doesn't suit us?

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

I am going to defer to our clerk.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

François Choquette NDP Drummond, QC

Very well.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

The debate would not be closed, but simply adjourned.

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Mr. Chair, in closing I would like to say that all of the witnesses who came to testify up till now will be able to see how ridiculous this situation is.

Thank you very much.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Thank you.

I must immediately ask that we vote on the motion that the debate be adjourned.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

François Choquette NDP Drummond, QC

I request a recorded vote.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Very well.

The vote having been held, I see that the votes are tied. I am going to refer to Speaker Regan's decision. You will remember that a few months ago the same thing happened in the House of Commons. There were equal yeas and nays and Speaker Regan had to decide.

With regard to continuing the debate, I want to say that we have not yet heard everyone. There are still people who want to give us their points of view. We are members of Parliament and it is important that we all get a chance to express our views and have them heard.

I am going to vote in favour of adjourning the debate so that we can come back to it and hear those who have not yet spoken on this.

(Motion agreed to: yeas, 5, nays, 4)

Let's get back to our business.

When I say that the debate on this topic is adjourned, it does not mean it is ended; it has been adjourned. When we get back to it, we will be able to hear those who have not spoken yet.

Mr. Choquette, you have the floor.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

François Choquette NDP Drummond, QC

Mr. Chair, you started out well but you seem to have tripped up. According to tradition and what the Speaker of the House, Mr. Regan, said, when there is a vote and the speaker or chair must decide, he must act so that the debate continues and is not stopped.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

That is correct.

4:20 p.m.

NDP

François Choquette NDP Drummond, QC

So, for the debate to continue, you have to vote for it to continue and not for it to be adjourned. That is what Speaker Regan's decision says.

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Denis Paradis

Mr. Choquette, you are right; the debate must continue. The fact of adjourning it will allow those who have not yet spoken to do so. My objective is to give the members around the table an opportunity to speak. And it is from that perspective that the debate has been adjourned.

We are pressed for time and there are witnesses here before us. I want the debate to continue, but we are going to adjourn it for now and get back to it later. That is what we did the last time. In fact, we had adjourned the debate and we picked it up again today. I am willing to go back to this debate at some point, when Mr. Clarke or others want to pick it up. For the moment, the debate is adjourned.

In fact, Mr. Clarke still had a few minutes.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Alupa Clarke Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

How important are you to the survival of your communities, respectively? How important is your newspaper for the survival of your linguistic minority community?

4:25 p.m.

Publisher, The Sherbrooke Record

Sharon McCully

I would say it's critical. We've seen, evidenced by community newspapers that have folded in other communities, that the demise of the institutional network follows afterwards. We're also the front door, the gatekeepers, for people to have information about health, social services, and education. Those institutions rely on our newspaper to provide information about them. I think the community vitality aspect is critical, and if we're not there to do it, nobody else is going to do it.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Alupa Clarke Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

Sir, is it the same for you?

4:25 p.m.

Co-Publisher, The North Shore News, Newsfirst Multimedia

George Guzmas

Absolutely.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Alupa Clarke Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

Okay. Did you come to Ottawa today principally to speak about all the burdens that your papers go through—because your association did that—or did you come here to see action from this committee?

4:25 p.m.

Publisher, The Sherbrooke Record

Sharon McCully

I came to see action. As I said at the beginning, I've been 40 years in the newspaper, and I've been before many of these committees. This is not my first rodeo, if you will.

4:25 p.m.

Conservative

Alupa Clarke Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

I see.