Evidence of meeting #45 for Official Languages in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Julie Boyer  Assistant Deputy Minister, Official Languages, Heritage and Regions, Department of Canadian Heritage
Sarah Boily  Director General, Official Languages, Department of Canadian Heritage
Chantal Terrien  Manager, Modernization of the Official Languages Act, Department of Canadian Heritage
Alain Desruisseaux  Director General, Francophone Immigration Policy and Official Languages Division, Department of Citizenship and Immigration
Carsten Quell  Executive Director, Official Languages Centre of Excellence, People and Culture, Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer, Treasury Board Secretariat

Noon

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

That's a perfectly legitimate procedure.

Is there unanimous consent to withdraw the amendment?

I'm going to do it the other way around. Is there anyone opposed to unanimous consent? I'm looking at the screen and around the table.

Mr. Beaulieu, are you opposed? So there is no unanimous consent.

Mr. Beaulieu, you have the floor.

Noon

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

I didn't ask for the floor. I would ask that we vote on the amendment, please.

Noon

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

To withdraw the amendment?

Noon

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Yes.

Noon

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Mr. Chair, could you ask Mr. Beaulieu again whether or not he agrees to unanimous consent? I'm not sure if he actually heard the procedure because of the technical problems.

Noon

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Okay.

I'll start the procedure again, Mr. Beaulieu.

Mr. Godin was asking if there was unanimous consent to withdraw his amendment, which is allowed. That is the question that was asked. Is there unanimous consent?

Noon

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

No.

Noon

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Okay. Thank you.

We'll continue the discussion on the amendment.

Mr. Beaulieu, you were next.

12:05 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

I ask that we vote on this amendment.

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Thank you very much, Mr. Beaulieu.

We're proceeding according to the rules.

Go ahead, Madam Clerk.

(Amendment negatived: nays 6; yeas 5) [See Minutes of Proceedings]

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

We'll move on to the next clause.

Mr. Vis, would you like to say something?

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

On page 2 at line 31 in English, Bill C-13 states:

And whereas the Government of Canada recognizes that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation contributes through its activities to enhancing the vitality of the English and French linguistic minority communities and to the protection and promotion of both official languages;

I have a problem with this paragraph, partly because I see Radio-Canada and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation as two separate entities.

The second point I'd also like to raise is that I don't actually believe that the CBC in English does much to promote English anymore. I would kindly ask that we rewrite the—

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

Marc Serré Liberal Nickel Belt, ON

A point of order, Mr. Chair.

I don't understand. We're supposed to debate the amendments. We're not going to start justifying the content.

Could you please clarify that?

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Amendments can be proposed in this way, on the spot. It's possible. Mr. Vis had indicated that he would do so.

However, it will have to be communicated in writing. We can consult with the legislative clerks, if anyone would like.

First, I want to understand what Mr. Vis wants to do.

Mr. Vis, the floor is yours.

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon, BC

This morning I was just reading this. I hadn't looked at this clause very closely before, but CBC and Radio-Canada are administered separately, so it doesn't make sense to have one referenced in English and one in French.

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Excuse me, Mr. Chair.

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Wait a moment.

I have to suspend the meeting.

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

It's not in the order of the clauses.

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

There are a lot of technical aspects here.

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

We need to move on to BQ‑1 before we go to his comment.

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

Yes, there are a lot of technical aspects to deal with.

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Thank you.

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

We are suspending the meeting briefly.

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal René Arseneault

We are resuming the meeting.

Mr. Vis, I did indeed make a mistake. I misunderstood what you were explaining to me. The amendment you proposed concerns the lines following those affected by BQ‑1. It may include what you're saying.

We can discuss it, but in English, BQ‑1 starts at line 19. In French, it starts at line 17.

That takes precedence over what you wanted to do. I apologize for the confusion.

We're now moving on to BQ‑1.

Go ahead, Mr. Beaulieu.

12:05 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Thank you.

I want you to know that I sent a new proposed amendment to the clerk. I don't know if she was able to get it to you.