I believe this is a very important amendment. For 52 years, positive measures under the Official Languages Act have served only to support the anglophone community and go against the Charter of the French Language, which seeks to make French the common and official language in Quebec in order to promote the inclusion of newcomers.
However, those positive measures support services in English in all sectors. Every time, it sends the message to newcomers that they have a choice between French and English and they don't need to learn French. We know, however, that in a context in which English is in the majority in Canada and in North America, it encourages newcomers to join the English side.
The right of the Quebec people to self-determination, the right to guarantee the future of the language of that people, is also in issue here. As we know, a language management method like the scheme imposed by the Official Languages Act, that is, undifferentiated institutional bilingualism, always ends up with assimilation of the minority languages in the world. The only countries where there is more than one national official language but the minority languages have not been assimilated are those countries where, in a particular geographic area, there is a common language. In Belgium and Switzerland, that doesn't prevent anyone from learning multiple other languages, but it guarantees the future of Flemish in Belgium or French in Wallonia.
So the purpose of the proposed amendment is to amend clause 21 of the bill.
In point (a), which refers to French and English, we propose to replace lines 13 and 14 on page 11 with the following:
due to the predominant use of English and that it is the official and common language of Quebec, is committed to protecting and promoting the French language while respecting the linguistic development of Quebec provided for in the Charter of the French Language.
We add that French is the official language, and that raises the question of whether it is possible to guarantee the future of French in Canada. Personally, I think that if there is no way to obtain arrangements that comply with the Charter of the French Language, that means there is no way to guarantee the future of French in Canada.
It would be progress to admit that French is in decline. It would be further progress to agree to a certain form of asymmetry by saying that French is in the minority in Canada and North America. Quebeckers who speak French are part of that minority, while anglophones are part of the anglophone majority in Canada.
Historically, English has played a dominant role in Quebec. Anglophones have their overfunded institutions and the current positive measures are contributing to keeping them overfunded, and this operates to anglicize newcomers and francophones.
In point (b), which deals with positive measures, we propose to replace line 32 on page 11 with the following:
subsections (1) to (3) and to respect the linguistic development of Quebec provided for in the Charter of the French Language.
In point (c), which deals with the different needs of the anglophone and francophone communities, we are replacing lines 10 to 13 on page 12 with the following:
(ii) the necessity of considering the specific, different needs of each of the two official language communities of Canada, and (iii) the necessity of protecting and promoting French in Quebec, taking into account that French is the official and common language of Quebec; and
Last, point (d) proposes to amend line 15 on page 13 to require that the Canadian government also consult the provincial and territorial governments before imposing measures.
That summarizes all of the points in amendment BQ-23 that I believe to be important. If there is a genuine desire to protect French in Quebec, there has got to be some flexibility and adaptability in the positive measures, to respect the minority character of French in Canada and North America.