Evidence of meeting #33 for Public Accounts in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was bélair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Raymond Bélair  Royal Lepage
Bruce Atyeo  President, ENVOY Relocation Services Inc.
Ian Bennett  Acting Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions, Public Works and Government Services Canada
Richard Goodfellow  Manager, Project Delivery Services Division, Public Works and Government Services Canada
Ronnie Campbell  Assistant Auditor General, Office of the Auditor General of Canada
Bruce Sloan  Principal, Office of the Auditor General of Canada
Ellen Stensholt  Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Public Works and Government Services Canada
Georges Etoka  Clerk of the Committee, Standing Committee on Public Accounts

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Shawn Murphy

Mr. Williams, I can appreciate where you're coming from. I'm just shaking my head up here listening to this testimony.

This is a major dispute. We're talking millions and millions of dollars. He's answered the question as well as he could.

Do you have anything to add, Mr. Bélair?

4:55 p.m.

Royal Lepage

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Shawn Murphy

I think we're going to move on.

Colleagues, we're going to adjourn here in 15 minutes and go in camera. I'm going to come back to you, Mr. Williams.

I'm going to give everyone three minutes. Ms. Ratansi, Mr. Williams, Mr. Laforest, and Mr. Christopherson will all have three minutes.

December 12th, 2006 / 4:55 p.m.

Liberal

Yasmin Ratansi Liberal Don Valley East, ON

Mr. Goodfellow, do you have the request for proposals submitted by Royal LePage in your possession?

4:55 p.m.

Manager, Project Delivery Services Division, Public Works and Government Services Canada

Richard Goodfellow

No, ma'am, I don't.

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

Yasmin Ratansi Liberal Don Valley East, ON

Could we have it made available to the committee, please? I want the documentation.

4:55 p.m.

Ellen Stensholt Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Public Works and Government Services Canada

That depends. We would exclude from it commercially confidential information, such as bid unit prices. You're asking for their proposal. They would have put in individual unit prices. That is close to sacred information to a commercial entity. We can release the total bid price, but not the individual unit prices. We simply don't ever release that. It's an exemption from the Access to Information Act. It's exempt under the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act. That's just not produceable.

4:55 p.m.

Liberal

Yasmin Ratansi Liberal Don Valley East, ON

Okay.

The RFP asked for two things: the administration, and then there was a third-party component to it. I'm an auditor and an accountant by trade, so if I don't see these things and I'm hearing things—we've been sitting for two days of testimony and we're not getting any responses. I'd like to see what they did respond.

If there's a conflict between what Mr. Bélair understands the contract said—I looked at page 240 of the RFP. “Ceiling Rates for Third Party Services” clearly states that you have to quote the third-party services. If you claim that was not part of the RFP and there is a confusion, I want to know. And if he quoted zero, then we need to know why Royal LePage quoted zero.

4:55 p.m.

Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Public Works and Government Services Canada

Ellen Stensholt

Frankly, Mr. Bélair is in a better position to answer why he quoted and bid in a certain way. We simply accept the bid as it comes in.

With respect to the confidentiality, I want to add something. When our whole bidding process is reviewed, for example, at the Canadian International Trade Tribunal or before a court, the way this confidential information is handled is it's given only to the counsel for the complainant for the party, and they have to sign an undertaking that they won't give that information to anybody. The undertaking is backed up with penal consequence. It is truly a serious matter to commercial entities.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Yasmin Ratansi Liberal Don Valley East, ON

Okay. If it is a serious matter, could you please blank out whatever you have to blank out and provide it to us? At least we will know what we're looking at.

5 p.m.

Senior General Counsel, Legal Services, Public Works and Government Services Canada

5 p.m.

Liberal

Yasmin Ratansi Liberal Don Valley East, ON

Mr. Bélair, you have been responding to the questions, saying you were not bidding on property management, but it says clearly in the RFP—I am really concerned as to how you could bid on a contract and say this was not part of it. Why is the Government of Canada responsible for millions of dollars in charges?

5 p.m.

Royal Lepage

Raymond Bélair

Property management fees are charged directly to transferees and reimbursed from their own personal dollars.

5 p.m.

Liberal

Yasmin Ratansi Liberal Don Valley East, ON

Sorry, that is the answer you've been giving, and I don't want that answer. The problem is that it says so in the contract.

I want to know, why did you quote zero? If you quoted zero, then you shouldn't have charged it. It is fraud. If you don't remember, it's on page 240 of the RFP.

Since my time is up, I can't ask anyone any questions, but I certainly don't want the answer that you've given in that book.

5 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Shawn Murphy

Do you have any brief comment, Mr. Bélair?

5 p.m.

Royal Lepage

5 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Shawn Murphy

Thank you very much, Mrs. Ratansi.

We go back to either Mr. Williams or the Conservative members for three minutes.

5 p.m.

Conservative

John Williams Conservative Edmonton—St. Albert, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Mr. Bélair, I'm still back at this issue based on the RFP of 9,000 moves, because that's what it said. You said okay, we're prepared to provide that free of charge and it's not a problem?

5 p.m.

Royal Lepage

Raymond Bélair

When we prepared the bid, we looked at the total cost to the Crown, and based on the RFP—based on the policies, based on the contract—we determined that property management did not cost the Crown anything.

5 p.m.

Conservative

John Williams Conservative Edmonton—St. Albert, AB

Mr. Campbell, he says it's not going to cost the Crown anything, and you stated in whatever page it was that these services were bid zero. Mr. Bélair is stating that these property management fees are to be paid from the personalized envelope.

Now I want your absolute assurance that this is totally and completely unambiguous and clear in the contract that a figure was requested to provide these property management services, for which the government was going to pay. Therefore, for the employee, for the military personnel, if they decided to rent out their house, the government was going to pay the tab for the rental management, and the RFP required the bidders to put in a cost for that service. Am I correct?

5 p.m.

Assistant Auditor General, Office of the Auditor General of Canada

Ronnie Campbell

There are two things, Mr. Chairman. Yes, the bidders were asked to bid a price for those services, even though those particular services were to be paid out of the personalized amount of the individuals. Our understanding was that this was a ceiling price, which would protect the individual members, in terms of the prices they would be charged.

5 p.m.

Conservative

John Williams Conservative Edmonton—St. Albert, AB

I have some confusion in my mind. So the personnel were to pay something themselves?

5 p.m.

Assistant Auditor General, Office of the Auditor General of Canada

Ronnie Campbell

There was a personalized amount for each individual, but in each of the cases there was a ceiling price bid. That was the limit the individual would be expected to pay.

5 p.m.

Conservative

John Williams Conservative Edmonton—St. Albert, AB

And the bid was zero?

5 p.m.

Assistant Auditor General, Office of the Auditor General of Canada

Ronnie Campbell

That's right.